Notes and discussions. On physicalism, physical properties, and panpsychism
Dialectica 57 (4):413–422 (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert Schroer (2010). How Far Can the Physical Sciences Reach? American Philosophical Quarterlly 47 (3):253-266.
Andrew Melnyk (1994). Being a Physicalist: How and (More Importantly) Why. Philosophical Studies 74 (2):221-241.
Neal Judisch (2008). Why 'Non-Mental' Won't Work: On Hempel's Dilemma and the Characterization of the 'Physical'. Philosophical Studies 140 (3):299 - 318.
Andrew Melnyk (1996). Formulating Physicalism: Two Suggestions. Synthese 105 (3):381-407.
Richard Double (1983). Nagel's Argument That Mental Properties Are Nonphysical. Philosophy Research Archives 9:217-22.
Robert Schroer (2012). Two Challenges That Categorical Properties Pose to Physicalism. Ratio 25 (2):195-206.
Tim Crane (2001). The Significance of Emergence. In Carl Gillett & Barry M. Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge University Press.
David M. Rosenthal (2006). Experience and the Physical. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (10-11):117-28.
Christian Nimtz & M. Schutte (2003). On Physicalism, Physical Properties, and Panpsychism. Dialectica 57 (4):413-22.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #122,917 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
