Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 40 (1):1-9 (1973)
|Abstract||The problem of the critical assessment of theories across paradigms raised by Kuhn is not resolved, it is argued, either by Scheffler's appeal to initial credibility or by Lakatos' conception of a research program. It is argued further that, in these contexts, the notion of reasonable choice by individuals makes no sense. The conclusion supports Feyerabend's position of "epistemological anarchism."|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
R. T. Herbert (1991). Is Coming to Believe in God Reasonable or Unreasonable? Faith and Philosophy 8 (1):36-50.
Kaisa Herne & Maija Setälä (2004). A Response to the Critique of Rational Choice Theory: Lakatos' and Laudan's Conceptions Applied. Inquiry 47 (1):67 – 85.
John Manchak (2011). What Is a Physically Reasonable Space-Time? Philosophy of Science 78 (3):410-420.
Dan Arnold (2001). How to Do Things with Candrakirti: A Comparative Study in Anti-Skepticism. Philosophy East and West 51 (2):247-279.
Jonathan Y. Tsou (2003). Reconsidering Feyerabend's 'Anarchism'. Perspectives on Science 11 (2):208-235.
William Hare (1997). Reason in Teaching: Scheffler's Philosophy of Education ÂA Maximum of Vision and a Minimum of Mysteryâ. Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (1/2):89-101.
Gerald Doppelt (1978). Kuhn's Epistemological Relativism: An Interpretation and Defense. Inquiry 21 (1-4):33 – 86.
Thaddeus Metz (2002). The Reasonable and the Moral. Social Theory and Practice 28 (2):277-301.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,429 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?