David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):739-742 (2011)
The identification of plausible epistemic approaches in science as well as the social problem definitions with which scientists implicitly work is essential for the quality of a deliberative public policy. While responding to the Nanofutures project, I will reflect on the essential elements of such a policy
|Keywords||Deliberation Public policy Nanotechnology Plausibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Cynthia Selin (2011). Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):723-737.
Michiel van Oudheusden (2011). Questioning 'Participation': A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):673-690.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
René Schomberg (2011). On Identifying Plausibility and Deliberative Public Policy. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):739-742.
Susan Dodds & Rachel A. Ankeny (2006). Regulation of hESC Research in Australia: Promises and Pitfalls for Deliberative Democratic Approaches. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):95-107.
Laurel S. Gleason (2011). Revisiting “the Voice of the People”: An Evaluation of the Claims and Consequences of Deliberative Polling. Critical Review 23 (3):371-392.
William Rehg, Peter McBurney & Simon Parsons (2004). Computer Decision-Support Systems for Public Argumentation: Assessing Deliberative Legitimacy. [REVIEW] AI and Society 19 (3):203-228.
Robert B. Talisse (2004). Does Public Ignorance Defeat Deliberative Democracy? Critical Review 16 (4):455-463.
Martyn Griffin (2012). Deliberative Democracy and Emotional Intelligence: An Internal Mechanism to Regulate the Emotions. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (6):517-538.
Vanessa Scholes (2011). Beyond Serving a Purpose: Additional Ethical Focuses for Public Policy Agents. In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David Eng (eds.), Ethics and public policy: contemporary issues. Victoria University Press.
Jonathan Aldred (2002). It's Good to Talk: Deliberative Institutions for Environmental Policy. Philosophy and Geography 5 (2):133 – 152.
Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij (2012). Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable. Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (3):199-220.
John Parkinson (2006). Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. OUP Oxford.
Summer Johnson (2006). Multiple Roles and Successes in Public Bioethics: A Response to the Public Forum Critique of Bioethics Commissions. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):173-188.
Robert Hoppe (2008). Scientific Advice and Public Policy: Expert Advisers' and Policymakers' Discourses on Boundary Work. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 6 (3-4):235-263.
Anwar Tlili & Emily Dawson (2010). Mediating Science and Society in the EU and UK: From Information-Transmission to Deliberative Democracy? Minerva 48 (4):429-461.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-08-30
Total downloads4 ( #198,584 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?