David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
ld English manors have their ghosts. And though I would not want to call analytic philosophy a ‘manor’, nor exactly ‘old’, it certainly is of some decent English origin, and it left adolescence a while ago. No wonder then, that it is not exempt from haunting terrors. One particular spectre has been haunting it for decades; it already gave some analytic pioneers the creeps, and we still now and then find people terrified by it: the ghost of old Bradley has not yet found its rest and keeps on threatening people with his notorious regress. The present essay is a lecture in exorcism; much of the fear old Bradley spread, so I will argue, peters out once we dare to look it in the eye. However, this essay is not primarily exegetical, and especially not an attempt in interpreting Bradley. I find Bradley’s writings, to say the least, not particularly accessible. Discussions of isolated passages from his longer treatises will probably be less fruitful than a careful study of the positions within the whole argumentative structure, supplied by the examination of Bradley’s intellectual upcoming. His treatments on relations and properties, in which he develops the famous regress argument, are motivated by a radical goal: a vindication of some form of monism. To reach this goal, he tries to deconstruct the most basic categories of our ordinary conceptual framework. Thus, he holds that..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ricki Bliss (2013). Viciousness and the Structure of Reality. Philosophical Studies 166 (2):399-418.
Similar books and articles
Holger Leerhoff (2008). Bradley's Regress, Russell's States of Affairs, and Some General Remarks on the Problem. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (2):249-264.
Anna-Sofia Maurin (2010). Trope Theory and the Bradley Regress. Synthese 175 (3):311-326.
Guido Bonino (2013). Bradley's Regress: Relations, Exemplification, Unity. Axiomathes 23 (2):189-200.
Benjamin Schnieder (2010). Propositions United. Dialectica 64 (2):289-301.
William F. Vallicella (2002). Relations, Monism, and the Vindication of Bradley's Regress. Dialectica 56 (1):3–35.
Sean Sayers (1991). F.H. Bradley and the Concept of Relative Truth. Radical Philosophy 59 (59):15-20.
F. H. Bradley (1994). Writings on Logic and Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Anna Marmodoro (2010). Do Powers Need Powers to Make Them Powerful?: From Pandispositionalism to Aristotle. In , The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations. Routledge. 337 - 352.
Darryl Wright (1998). A Platonist's Copernican Revolution. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:1-28.
Peter Schulte (2007). How to Link Particulars to Universals: Four Versions of Bradley's Regress Refuted. Philosophia Naturalis 44 (2):219-237.
M. Glouberman (1988). Interpreting Bradley: The Critique of Fact-Pluralism. History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (2):205-223.
Fraser MacBride (2011). Relations and Truthmaking. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):161-179.
W. J. Mander (1994). An Introduction to Bradley's Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads40 ( #50,297 of 1,410,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #76,538 of 1,410,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?