Our Moral Obligation to Support Space Exploration
Environmental Ethics 33 (1):67-88 (2011)
| Abstract | The moral obligation to support space exploration follows from our obligations to protect the environment and to survive as a species. It can be justified through three related arguments: one supporting space exploration as necessary for acquiring resources, and two illustrating the need for space technology in order to combat extraterrestrial threats such as meteorite impacts. Three sorts of objections have been raised against this obligation. The first are objections alleging that supporting space exploration is impractical. The second is the widely held notion that space exploration and environmentalism are at odds with one another. Finally, there are two objections to using space resources that Robert Sparrow has raised on the topic of terraforming. The obligation to support space exploration can be defended in at least three ways: (1) the "argument from resources," that space exploration is useful for amplifying our available resources; (2) the "argument from asteroids," that space exploration is necessary for protecting the environment and its inhabitants from extraterrestrial threats such as meteorite impacts; and (3) the "argument from solar burnout," that we are obligated to pursue interstellar colonization in order to ensure long-term human survival. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Environmental Ethics Space Exploration Ethics | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesErin Moore Daly Robert Frodeman (2008). Separated at Birth, Signs of Rapprochement: Environmental Ethics and Space Exploration. Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 135-151.
Erin Moore Daly & Robert Frodeman (2008). Separated at Birth, Signs of Rapprochement: Environmental Ethics and Space Exploration. Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):135 - 151.
William K. Hartmann (1984). Space Exploration and Environmental Issues. Environmental Ethics 6 (3):227-239.
Carlos León & Pablo Gervás (2010). The Role of Evaluation-Driven Rejection in the Successful Exploration of a Conceptual Space of Stories. Minds and Machines 20 (4):615-634.
Jeffrey Benjamin White (2008). Heidegger and the Space Of Life. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 19:181-188.
E. R. Klein (2007). Space Exploration: Humanity's Single Most Important Moral Imperative. Philosophy Now 61:8-10.
Mohan Matthen (forthcoming). Active Perception and the Representation of Space. In Dustin Stokes, Stephen Biggs & Mohan Matthen (eds.), Perception and Its Modalities. Oxford University Press.
John Oberdiek (2004). Lost in Moral Space: On the Infringing/Violating Distinction and its Place in the Theory of Rights. Law and Philosophy 23 (4):325 - 346.
Dan McArthur & Idil Boran (2004). Agent-Centered Restrictions and the Ethics of Space Exploration. Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (1):148–163.
Jeffrey Fiske (1992). The Use of Space Exploration In Arts/Humanities Curricula. Inquiry 10 (4):9-11.
Max Jammer (1969). Concepts of Space. Cambridge, Mass.,Harvard University Press.
Mariana Ortega (2004). Exiled Space, in‐Between Space: Existential Spatiality in Ana Mendieta'sSiluetasSeries. Philosophy and Geography 7 (1):25-41.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-28Total downloads34 ( #35,263 of 548,976 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,799 of 548,976 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
