Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (1):19-29 (2003)
|Abstract||This paper is a reaction to an article by John Arras published earlier in this journal. In this article Arras argues that freestanding pragmatism has little new to offer to bioethics. We respond to some of Arras' arguments and conclude that, although he overstates his case at certain points, his critique is, broadly speaking, correct. We then introduce and discuss an alternative approach to pragmatist ethics, one which puts to work the ideas and insights of pragmatism conceived as a broad philosophical movement, without lapsing into a canon dependent approach. The approach we propose exhibits a number of characteristics that differ from Arras'saccount of freestanding pragmatism and offers something new to bioethics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. D. Arras & T. H. Murray (1982). In Defence of Clinical Bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 8 (3):122-127.
John Arras, Theory and Bioethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Larry A. Hickman (2008). Postphenomenology and Pragmatism. Techné 12 (2):99-104.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
John D. Arras (2003). Rorty's Pragmatism and Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):597 – 613.
John Arras & Elizabeth Fenton (2010). Arras and Fenton Reply. Hastings Center Report 40 (3):5-6.
D. Micah Hester (2003). Is Pragmatism Well-Suited to Bioethics? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):545 – 561.
John D. Arras (2002). Pragmatism in Bioethics: Been There, Done That. Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):29-58.
John D. Arras (2001). Freestanding Pragmatism in Law and Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (2):69-85.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,679 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?