David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 151 (3):537 - 545 (2006)
The aim of this paper is to determine the plausibility of Robert Kirk's strict implication thesis as an explication of physicalism and its relation to Jackson and Chalmer's notion of application conditionals, to the notion of global supervenience and to a posteriori identities. It is argued that the strict implication thesis is subject to the same objection that affects the notion of global supervenience. Furthermore, reference to an idealised physics in the formulation of strict implication threatens to make the thesis vacuous. Third, Kirk's claim that the strict implication thesis does not entail reduction of the mental to the physical (excluding phenomenal properties) is untenable if a functional model of reduction is preferred over Nagel's classical model. Finally, Kirk's claim that the physical facts entail in an a priori way the fact that certain brain states feel somehow seems to be unfounded.
|Keywords||A priori knowledge Application conditionals Physicalism Reduction Strict implication Supervenience|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jaegwon Kim (1998). Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation. MIT Press.
David J. Chalmers & Frank Jackson (2001). Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation. Philosophical Review 110 (3):315-61.
Ernest Nagel (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Claude E. Shannon & Warren Weaver (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.
Tim Maudlin (1989). Computation and Consciousness. Journal of Philosophy 86 (August):407-32.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jurgen Schroder (2006). Physicalism and Strict Implication. Synthese 151 (3):537-545.
Robert Kirk (2006). Physicalism and Strict Implication. Synthese 151 (3):523-536.
Robert Kirk (1996). Strict Implication, Supervenience, and Physicalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):244-57.
Robert Kirk (1982). Physicalism, Identity, and Strict Implication. Ratio 24 (December):131-41.
Robert Kirk (2001). Nonreductive Physicalism and Strict Implication. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):544-552.
Jan Heylen & Leon Horsten (2006). Strict Conditionals: A Negative Result. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):536–549.
Robert Kirk (1996). How Physicalists Can Avoid Reductionism. Synthese 108 (2):157-70.
Claudio Cerrato (1994). Natural Deduction Based Upon Strict Implication for Normal Modal Logics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (4):471-495.
Robert Kirk (1996). Physicalism Lives. Ratio 9 (1):85-89.
Fabrice Correia (2001). Priorean Strict Implication, Q and Related Systems. Studia Logica 69 (3):411-427.
D. Gene Witmer (2006). How to Be a (Sort of) A Priori Physicalist. Philosophical Studies 131 (1):185-225.
Benedikt Paul Göcke (2009). What is Physicalism? Ratio 22 (3):291-307.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads18 ( #254,083 of 1,902,769 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #59,772 of 1,902,769 )
How can I increase my downloads?