David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 122 (3):227 - 241 (2005)
The article discusses an idea of how to extend the notion of rigidity to predicates, namely the idea that predicates stand in a certain systematic semantic relation to properties, such that this relation may hold rigidly or nonrigidly. The relation (which I call signification) can be characterised by recourse to canonical property designators which are derived from predicates (or general terms) by means of nominalization: a predicate signifies that property which the derived property designator designates. Whether signification divides into rigid and non-rigid cases will then depend uponwhether canonical property designators divide into rigid and non-rigid ones. But, I shall argue, they do not, and so the only notion of rigidity gained this way is trivial. To show this, I first focus on the kind of canonical property designators which could be thought to be nonrigid, canonical designators such as having the colour of ripe tomatoes which themselves contain non-rigid property designators. An argument to the effect that such complex canonical designators are non-rigid is rebutted, five arguments to the effect that they are rigid are formulated, and finally an explanation of their rigidity based on the general nature of canonical property designators is presented.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Logic Philosophy of Mind Philosophy of Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Saul A. Kripke (1980). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press.
Saul Kripke (2010). Naming and Necessity. In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge 431-433.
Scott Soames (2002). Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford University Press.
Stephen Neale (1990). Descriptions. MIT Press.
Wolfgang Künne (2003). Conceptions of Truth. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Jussi Haukioja (2006). Proto-Rigidity. Synthese 150 (2):155 - 169.
Kathrin Glüer & Peter Pagin (2012). General Terms and Relational Modality. Noûs 46 (1):159-199.
Benjamin Schnieder (2010). Inexpressible Properties and Grelling's Antinomy. Philosophical Studies 148 (3):369 - 385.
Alexander Steinberg (2013). Pleonastic Possible Worlds. Philosophical Studies 164 (3):767-789.
David Liebesman (2013). Converse and Identity. Dialectica 67 (2):137-155.
Similar books and articles
Mark Textor (1998). Rigidity and De Jure Rigidity. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):45-59.
Corine Besson (2010). Rigidity, Natural Kind Terms, and Metasemantics. In Helen Beebee & Nigel Sabbarton-Leary (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. Routledge 25--44.
Nathan Salmon (2012). Generality. Philosophical Studies 161 (3):471-481.
Joseph LaPorte (2006). Rigid Designators for Properties. Philosophical Studies 130 (2):321 - 336.
Benjamin Schnieder (2006). Canonical Property Designators. American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):119 - 132.
Pierre Baumann (2010). Are Proper Names Rigid Designators? Axiomathes 20 (2-3):333-346.
Benjamin Schnieder (2008). Further Remarks on Property Designators and Rigidity (Reply to López de Sa's Criticisms). Grazer Philosophische Studien 76 (1):199-208.
Berit Brogaard (2007). A Puzzle About Properties. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):635-650.
Dan López de Sa (2006). Flexible Property Designators. Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):221-230.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads228 ( #11,571 of 1,907,897 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #41,454 of 1,907,897 )
How can I increase my downloads?