Foundations of Science 6 (4):241-253 (2001)
|Abstract||The way physics and other parts of science work can be explained in the framework of radical constructivism. However, this constructivist view itself shows that a uniquily accepted epistemology, constructivism or any other, would not be an advantage for the developmentof science. Unlike physics some parts of science successfully use constructivist concepts inside their theories. Because this is the case particularly in learning theory, constructivist ideas can help to improve physics teaching.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
A. Riegler & A. Quale (2010). Editorial: Can Radical Constructivism Become a Mainstream Endeavor? Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):1-5.
T. Hug (2010). Radical Constructivism Mainstreaming: A Desirable Endeavor? Critical Considerations Using Examples From Educational Studies and Learning Theory. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):58-65.
K. H. Müller (2010). The Radical Constructivist Movement and Its Network Formations. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):31-39.
Derek Louis Meyer (2009). The Poverty of Constructivism. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (3):332-341.
Liberato Cardellini (2008). The Views and Influence of Ernst Von Glasersfeld: An Introduction. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2).
John Stewart (2001). Radical Constructivism in Biology and Cognitive Science. Foundations of Science 6 (1-3):99-124.
Peter Fletcher (2002). A Constructivist Perspective on Physics. Philosophia Mathematica 10 (1):26-42.
A. Scholl (2010). Radical Constructivism in Communication Science. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):51-57.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #160,284 of 549,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?