Philosophical Relations, Natural Relations, and Philosophic Decisionism in Belief in the External World: Comments on P. J. E. Kail, Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy
Hume Studies 36 (1) (2011)
| Abstract | My critical comments on Part I of P. J. E. Kail's Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy are divided into two parts. First, I challenge the exegetical details of Kail's take on Hume's important distinction between natural and philosophical relations. I show that Kail misreads Hume in a subtle fashion. If I am right, then much of the machinery that Kail puts into place for his main argument does different work in Hume than Kail thinks. Second, I offer a brief criticism of Kail's argument for reading Hume "as a realist about the external world" (Kail, 67). The two parts are (loosely) tied together because it turns out that Kail and I disagree about how Hume thinks of philosophers' activity generally.One caveat: .. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Jacqueline Taylor (2011). Gilding and Staining and the Significance of Our Moral Sentiments. Hume Studies 36 (1):89-95.
P. J. E. Kail (2007/2010). Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
P. J. E. Kail (2011). Précis of Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy. Hume Studies 36 (1):61-65.
Don Garrett (2011). Once More Into the Labyrinth: Kail's Realist Explanation of Hume's Second Thoughts About Personal Identity. Hume Studies 36 (1).
Eric Schliesser (2010). Philosophical Relations, Natural Relations, and Philosophic Decisionism in Belief in the External World. Hume Studies 36 (1):67-76.
P. J. E. Kail (2011). Response to My Critics. Hume Studies 36 (1):97-107.
Kenneth P. Winkler (2010). P.J.E. Kail's Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy. Philosophical Books 51 (3):144-159.
L. E. Loeb (2009). Review: P. J. E. Kail: Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Mind 118 (469):181-185.
Donald C. Ainslie (2009). Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy. By P. J. E. Kail. Metaphilosophy 40 (2):292-296.
P. J. E. Kail (2007). Understanding Hume's Natural History of Religion. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):190–211.
P. J. E. Kail (2001). Projection and Necessity in Hume. European Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):24–54.
Angela Coventry (2008). Review of "Projection and Realism in Hume’s Philosophy" by P.J.E Kail. [REVIEW] The Notre Dame Philosophical Review.
Peter Kail (2003). Conceivability and Modality in Hume: A Lemma in an Argument in Defense of Skeptical Realism. Hume Studies 29 (1):43--61.
Angela Coventry (2008). Review: P. J. E. Kail, Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (7).
P. J. E. Kail (2005). Hume's Ethical Conclusion. In Marina Frasca-Spada & P. J. E. Kail (eds.), Impressions of Hume. Oxford University Press.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-06-06Total downloads35 ( #34,202 of 549,697 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,697 )How can I increase my downloads? |

