Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):207-208 (2004)
|Abstract||I share the authors' stance on the dialogic or interactional character of language. The authors, however, have left actual interaction out of their conception of dialogue. I sketch a number of organizations of practices of talking and understanding that supply the basic arena for talk-in-interaction. It is by reference to these that mechanisms for speech production and understanding need to be understood.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hanne De Jaegher (2009). Social Understanding Through Direct Perception? Yes, by Interacting. Consciousness & Cognition 18 (2):535-542.
John L. Locke (2002). Dancing with Humans: Interaction as Unintended Consequence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):632-633.
Aug Nishizaka (1999). Doing Interpreting Within Interaction: The Interactive Accomplishment of a “Henna Gaijin” or “Strange Foreigner”. [REVIEW] Human Studies 22 (2-4):235-251.
Arnulf Deppermann (2011). The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics. Human Studies 34 (2):115-128.
Nina Howe (2004). The Sibling Relationship as a Context for the Development of Social Understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):110-111.
Jeremy I. M. Carpendale & Charlie Lewis (2004). Constructing an Understanding of Mind: The Development of Children's Social Understanding Within Social Interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):79-96.
Shaun Gallagher (2011). Strong Interaction and Self-Agency. Humana.Mente 15:55-76.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,297 of 722,708 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,708 )
How can I increase my downloads?