In R. Schantz (ed.), Current Issues in Theoretical Philosophy: Prospects for Meaning Vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter (2007)
|Abstract||Although there is a vast literature on whether propositional attitudes are relations to propositions, a crucial question that ought to lie at the heart of this debate is not often enough seriously addressed. This is the question of the contribution propositions make to the ways in which we benefit from having our propositional-attitude concepts, if those concepts are concepts of relations to propositions. Unless propositions can be shown to confer a benefit that no non-propositions could provide, we should probably doubt whether propositional attitudes really are relations to propositions. I believe that propositional attitudes are relations to propositions and that the role played by them in our conceptual economy cannot be played by things of any other kind, and in this paper I try to say why. This paper, in other words, offers my answer to the question posed by my title.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edward N. Zalta (1993). A Philosophical Conception of Propositional Modal Logic. Philosophical Topics 21 (2):263-281.
Wayne A. Davis (2008). Thought Structure, Belief Content, and Possession Conditions. Acta Analytica 23 (3):207-231.
Mark E. Richard (1990). Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Susan Brower-Toland, Can God Know More? A Case Study in the Later Medieval Debate About Propositions.
Jeffrey C. King (2013). On Fineness of Grain. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):763-781.
Anthony Palmer (2011). Propositions, Properties and Relations: Wittgenstein's “Notes on Logic” and the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations 34 (1):77-93.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads101 ( #6,033 of 549,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,124 )
How can I increase my downloads?