David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 25 (4):595 - 615 (2012)
Both visual experience and conscious thought represent external objects, but in visual experience these objects seem present before the mind and available for direct access in a way that they don?t in conscious thought. In this paper, I introduce a couple of challenges that this ?Scene-Immediacy? of visual experience raises for traditional versions of Representationalism. I then identify a resource to which Representationalists can appeal in addressing these challenges: the low-detail fringe of visual experience. I argue that low-detail contents within visual experience provide the mind with a rich access to additional high-detail information, an access that is not found in conscious thought. This access, in turn, speaks to the challenges raised by the Scene-Immediacy of visual experience. Robert Schroer is an Assistant Professor at the University of Minnesota at Duluth
|Keywords||Representationalism perceptual consciousness Scene-Immediacy perceptual presence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Alva Noë (2005). Action in Perception. The MIT Press.
Gareth Evans (1982). Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Nagel (1974). What is It Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
John Searle (1983). Intentionality. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Evan Thompson (2008). Representationalism and the Phenomenology of Mental Imagery. Synthese 160 (3):203--213.
Wayne Wright (2005). Distracted Drivers and Unattended Experience. Synthese 144 (1):41-68.
Todd Ganson & Ben Bronner (2013). Visual Prominence and Representationalism. Philosophical Studies 164 (2):405-418.
Uriah Kriegel (2004). Perceptual Experience, Conscious Content, and Nonconceptual Content. Essays in Philosophy 5 (1):1-14.
Susanna Siegel (2006). Subject and Object in the Contents of Visual Experience. Philosophical Review 115 (3):355--88.
Alva Noë (2001). Experience and the Active Mind. Synthese 61 (1):41-60.
Susanna Schellenberg (2010). The Particularity and Phenomenology of Perceptual Experience. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):19-48.
[author unknown] (2004). Research Article. Minds and Machines 10 (4):583-584.
Alva Noë (2001). Experience and the Active Mind. Synthese 129 (1):41-60.
Alva Noë, Luis Pessoa & Evan Thompson (2000). Beyond the Grand Illusion: What Change Blindness Really Teaches Us About Vision. Visual Cognition 7 (1-3):93-106.
Thomas Natsoulas (1989). The Distinction Between Visual Perceiving and Visual Perceptual Experience. Journal of Mind and Behavior 10 (1):37-61.
John Louis Schwenkler (2009). Space and Self-Awareness. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Eric Schwitzgebel (2000). How Well Do We Know Our Own Conscious Experience? The Case of Human Echolocation. Philosophical Topics 28 (5-6):235-46.
Added to index2011-03-31
Total downloads226 ( #13,082 of 1,934,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)23 ( #28,394 of 1,934,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?