Relevant deduction and hypothetico-deductivism: A reply to Gemes
Erkenntnis 41 (2):183 - 188 (1994)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLuca Moretti (2006). The Tacking by Disjunction Paradox: Bayesianism Versus Hypothetico-Deductivism. Erkenntnis 64 (1):115-138.
C. Kenneth Waters (1987). Relevance Logic Brings Hope to Hypothetico-Deductivism. Philosophy of Science 54 (3):453-464.
Ken Gemes (1998). Hypothetico-Deductivism: The Current State of Play; The Criterion of Empirical Significance: Endgame. Erkenntnis 49 (1):1 - 20.
Ken Gemes (1990). Horwich, Hempel, and Hypothetico-Deductivism. Philosophy of Science 57 (4):699-702.
Ken Gemes (1994). Schurz on Hypothetico-Deductivism. Erkenntnis 41 (2):171 - 181.
Ken Gemes (2005). Hypothetico-Deductivism: Incomplete but Not Hopeless. Erkenntnis 63 (1):139 - 147.
Ken Gemes (1993). Hypothetico-Deductivism, Content, and the Natural Axiomatization of Theories. Philosophy of Science 60 (3):477-487.
Suck-Jung Park (2004). Hypothetico-Deductivism is Still Hopeless. Erkenntnis 60 (2):229-234.
Clark Glymour (1980). Hypothetico-Deductivism is Hopeless. Philosophy of Science 47 (2):322-325.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,171 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
