Graduate studies at Western
Critical Review 5 (2):247-260 (1991)
|Abstract||Thomas McCarthy has provided a trenchant critique of the deconstructionist turn in recent philosophy and has outlined a program of reconstruction in its aftermath. He develops his version of reconstructionist philosophy against the backdrop of Kant's doctrine of critical reason and the critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. However, McCarthy's reconstructionist design is not simply an appropriation and defense of Habermas. He provides a critical reformulation of the Habermasian position, deftly using Habermas against himself. The author is in accord both with McCarthy's disposition to problematize the premises of deconstruction and his call for philosophical reconstruction. In continuing the conversation, however, he distances himself farther than does McCarthy from the criteriological concept of rationality that was proposed by Kant and which continues to inform Habermas's requirement for the grounding of validity claims. In the process the author proposes a new approach to the resources of reason along the lines of what he has come to call the dynamics of transversal rationality.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stella Gaon (2004). Judging Justice: The Strange Responsibility of Deconstruction. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (1):97-114.
Roger Foster (2006). Rethinking the Critique of Instrumental Reason. Social Philosophy Today 22:169-184.
Amy Allen (2000). Reconstruction or Deconstruction?: A Reply to Johanna Meehan. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (3):53-60.
Ali Mesbah, Religion, Rationality, and Language : A Critical Analysis of Jürgen Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action.
Pablo Gilabert (2006). Considerations on the Notion of Moral Validity in the Moral Theories of Kant and Habermas. Kant-Studien 97 (2):210-227.
Charles Taylor (1992). Book Review:Ideals and Illusions: On Reconstruction and Deconstruction in Contemporary Critical Theory. Thomas McCarthy. [REVIEW] Ethics 102 (4):856-.
Roger Foster (2005). Pierre Bourdieu’s Critique of Scholarly Reason. Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (1):89-107.
Fred R. Dallmayr (1972). Review Symposium on Habermas : II—Critical Theory Criticized: Habermas's Knowledge and Human Interests and its Aftermath. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2 (1):211-229.
Jacques Derrida, Jürgen Habermas & Lasse Thomassen (eds.) (2006). The Derrida-Habermas Reader. University of Chicago Press.
Marianna Papastephanou (2012). Exploring Habermas's Critical Engagement with Chomsky. Human Studies 35 (1):51-76.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads4 ( #189,051 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?