Reactions to MacIntosh

Philo 14 (1):77-84 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his response to my trilogy, Jack MacIntosh suggests a variety of ways in which its conclusions may be challenged, drawing on considerations scientific, moral, and prudential. I argue that the challenges can be met, and, in the process, show how the trilogy’s reasoning can be extended and strengthened on a number of fronts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
39 (#356,630)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. L. Schellenberg
Mount Saint Vincent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references