Representing Von neumann–morgenstern games in the situation calculus
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sequential von Neumann–Morgernstern (VM) games are a very general formalism for representing multi-agent interactions and planning problems in a variety of types of environments. We show that sequential VM games with countably many actions and continuous utility functions have a sound and complete axiomatization in the situation calculus. This axiomatization allows us to represent game-theoretic reasoning and solution concepts such as Nash equilibrium. We discuss the application of various concepts from VM game theory to the theory of planning and multi-agent interactions, such as representing concurrent actions and using the Baire topology to define continuous payoff functions.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Johan van Benthem (2003). Logic Games Are Complete for Game Logics. Studia Logica 75 (2):183-203.
Lauri Carlson (1994). Logic for Dialogue Games. Synthese 99 (3):377 - 415.
Akira Okada & Eyal Winter (2002). A Non-Cooperative Axiomatization of the Core. Theory and Decision 53 (1):1-28.
Antonio Quesada (2001). The Normal Form is Not Sufficient. Economics and Philosophy 17 (2):235-243.
William Harper (1988). Decisions, Games and Equilibrium Solutions. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:344 - 362.
David Hawkins (1945). Book Review:Theory of Games and Economic Behavior John von Neumann, Oskar Morgenstern. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 12 (3):221-.
Prakash P. Shenoy (1998). Game Trees For Decision Analysis. Theory and Decision 44 (2):149-171.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?