Skepticism and epistemic logic
Studia Logica 66 (1):187-198 (2000)
| Abstract | This essay attempts to implement epistemic logic through a non-classical inference relation. Given that relation, an account of '(the individual) a knows that A' is constructed as an unfamiliar non-normal modal logic. One advantage to this approach is a new analysis of the skeptical argument. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDylan Dodd (2012). Evidentialism and Skeptical Arguments. Synthese 189 (2):337-352.
Slavko Brkic (2004). Presuppositions, Logic, and Dynamics of Belief. Prolegomena 3 (2):151-177.
Linton Wang & Oliver Tai (2010). Skeptical Conclusions. Erkenntnis 72 (2):177 - 204.
Yue J. Jiang (1993). An Intensional Epistemic Logic. Studia Logica 52 (2):259 - 280.
Vincent F. Hendricks & John Symons (2006). Where's the Bridge? Epistemology and Epistemic Logic. Philosophical Studies 128 (1):137 - 167.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2008). Epistemic Logic and Epistemology. In Vincent F. Hendricks & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), New Waves in Epistemology. Palgrave Macmillan.
John Symons (2006). Where's the Bridge? Epistemology and Epistemic Logic. Philosophical Studies 128 (1):137 - 167.
Barteld P. Kooi (2003). Probabilistic Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (4):381-408.
P. K. Schotch & R. E. Jennings (1981). Epistemic Logic, Skepticism, and Non-Normal Modal Logic. Philosophical Studies 40 (1):47 - 67.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads18 ( #67,496 of 549,017 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
