David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This chapter argues that the standard conception of Spinoza as a fellow-travelling mechanical philosopher and proto-scientific naturalist is misleading. It argues, first, that Spinoza’s account of the proper method for the study of nature presented in the Theological-Political Treatise (TTP) points away from the one commonly associated with the mechanical philosophy. Moreover, throughout his works Spinoza’s views on the very possibility of knowledge of nature are decidedly sceptical (as specified below). Third, in the seventeenth-century debates over proper methods in the sciences, Spinoza sided with those that criticized the aspirations of those (the physico-mathematicians, Galileo, Huygens, Wallis, Wren, etc) who thought the application of mathematics to nature was the way to make progress. In particular, he offers grounds for doubting their confidence in the significance of measurement as well as their piece-meal methodology (see section 2). Along the way, this chapter offers a new interpretation of common notions in the context of treating Spinoza’s account of motion (see section 3)
|Keywords||Spinoza Criticism of Mathematical Natural Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marij van Strien (2014). On the Origins and Foundations of Laplacian Determinism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45 (1):24-31.
Similar books and articles
Eric Schliesser (2011). Spinoza on the Politics of PhilosophicalUnderstanding Susan James and Eric Schliesser Angels and Philosophers: With a New Interpretation of Spinoza's Common Notions. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):497-518.
George Louis Kline (1952). Spinoza in Soviet Philosophy: A Series of Essays, Selected and Translated, and with an Introduction. Hyperion Press.
C. M. Lorkowski (2009). The Miracle of Moses. Heythrop Journal 50 (2):181-188.
Eric Schliesser (2012). Newton and Spinoza: On Motion and Matter (and God, of Course). Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):436-458.
James S. Preus (2001). Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge University Press.
Olli Koistinen & J. I. Biro (eds.) (2002). Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes. Oxford University Press.
Lee C. Rice (1984). Spinoza's Account of Sexuality. Philosophy Research Archives 10:19-34.
Wiep van Bunge (2012). Spinoza Past and Present: Essays on Spinoza, Spinozism, and Spinoza Scholarship. Brill.
Steven Nadler (2008). Spinoza and Consciousness. Mind 117 (467):575-601.
Marx W. Wartofsky (1977). Nature, Number and Individuals: Motive and Method in Spinoza's Philosophy. Inquiry 20 (1-4):457 – 479.
Willi Goetschel (2003). Heine's Spinoza. Idealistic Studies 33 (2/3):203-217.
Simon B. Duffy (2006). The Difference Between Science and Philosophy: The Spinoza-Boyle Controversy Revisited. Paragraph 29 (2):115-138.
Beth Lord (2011). 'Disempowered by Nature': Spinoza on The Political Capabilities of Women. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1085 - 1106.
Edward Leroy Schaub (ed.) (1933). Spinoza, the Man and His Thought. Chicago, the Open Court Publishing Company.
Hubertus Gezinus Hubbeling (1967). Spinoza's Methodology. Assen, Van Gorcum & Comp..
Added to index2011-11-10
Total downloads305 ( #7,686 of 1,934,371 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #25,249 of 1,934,371 )
How can I increase my downloads?