- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Should Firms Go ‘Beyond Profits’? Milton Friedman Versus Broad CSR
Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22 (1):327-338 (2011)
Abstract
The paper explores the ongoing debate between the narrow version of CSR proposed by Milton Friedman and the broader version of CSR, which includes additional ethical and/or philanthropic obligations. Implications are then discussed.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Legitimate Social Demands on Corporations.Eric Palmer - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:151-154.
Assessing Milton Friedman’s View of CSR: Theory Versus Pragmatism in Advising Practitioners.Duane Windsor - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:277-282.
Ambition Versus Conscience, Does Corporate Social Responsibility Pay off? The Application of Matching Methods.Chung-Hua Shen & Yuan Chang - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (S1):133 - 153.
A critique of Milton Friedman's essay 'the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits'.Thomas Mulligan - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (4):265 - 269.
Milton Friedman, the Statistical Methodologist.David Teira - 2007 - History of Political Economy 39 (3):511-28.
Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies: An In-Depth Analysis of Italian Micro, Small, Medium-Sized, and Large Enterprises.Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:245-250.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-09-18
Downloads
166 (#112,803)
6 months
15 (#157,754)
2012-09-18
Downloads
166 (#112,803)
6 months
15 (#157,754)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A Responsibility to Whom? Populism and Its Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility.Christopher A. Hartwell & Timothy M. Devinney - 2024 - Business and Society 63 (2):300-340.
Different Drivers: Exploring Employee Involvement in Corporate Philanthropy.Beth Breeze & Pamala Wiepking - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 165 (3):453-467.
Amplifying a Relational Ethic: A Contribution to PRME Praxis.Amy Klemm Verbos & Maria Humphries - 2015 - Business and Society Review 120 (1):23-56.
Must Milton Friedman Embrace Stakeholder Theory?Ignacio Ferrero, W. Michael Hoffman & Robert E. McNulty - 2014 - Business and Society Review 119 (1):37-59.
A Corporate Social Responsibility Analysis of Payday Lending.Mark S. Schwartz & Chris Robinson - 2018 - Business and Society Review 123 (3):387-413.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo