Spinoza on the Politics of PhilosophicalUnderstanding Susan James and Eric Schliesser Angels and Philosophers: with a New Interpretation of Spinoza's Common Notions
Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):497-518 (2011)
|Abstract||In this paper I offer three main challenges to James (2011). All three turn on the nature of philosophy and secure knowledge in Spinoza. First, I criticize James's account of the epistemic role that experience plays in securing adequate ideas for Spinoza. In doing so I criticize her treatment of what is known as the ‘conatus doctrine’ in Spinoza in order to challenge her picture of the relationship between true religion and philosophy. Second, this leads me into a criticism of her account of the nature of philosophy in Spinoza. I argue it is less piecemeal and less akin to what we would recognize as ‘science’ than she suggests. Third, I argue against James's core commitment that Spinoza's three kinds of knowledge differ in degree; I claim they differ in kind. My argument will offer a new interpretation of Spinoza's conception of ‘common notions’. Moreover, I argue that Spinozistic adequate knowledge involves something akin to angelic disembodiment|
|Keywords||Spinoza Common Notions Philosophy Angels|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrea Sangiacomo (2011). Adequate Knowledge and Bodily Complexity in Spinoza’s Account of Consciousness. Methodus 6:77-104.
Susan James (2009). Law and Sovereignty in Spinoza's Politics. In Moira Gatens (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza. Pennsylvania State University Press.
George Louis Kline (1952/1981). Spinoza in Soviet Philosophy: A Series of Essays, Selected and Translated, and with an Introduction. Hyperion Press.
Heidi M. Ravven (2003). Hegel's Epistemic Turn—Or Spinoza's? Idealistic Studies 33 (2/3):195-202.
Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2012). Review of Susan James, Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
Susan James, Genevieve Lloyd & Moira Gatens (2000). The Power of Spinoza: Feminist Conjunctions. Hypatia 15 (2):40-58.
Francesca di Poppa (2009). Abraham Cohen Herrera. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):491-507.
Susan James (2008). Democracy and the Good Life in Spinoza's Philosophy. In Charles Huenemann (ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Steven Nadler (2008). Spinoza and Consciousness. Mind 117 (467):575-601.
Colin Marshall (2012). Spinoza on Destroying Passions with Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):139-160.
Susan James (2012). When Does Truth Matter? Spinoza on the Relation Between Theology and Philosophy. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):91-108.
Susan James Interviews, Genevieve Lloyd & Moira Gatens (2000). The Power of Spinoza: Feminist Conjunctions. Hypatia 15 (2):40 - 58.
Willi Goetschel (2003). Heine's Spinoza. Idealistic Studies 33 (2/3):203-217.
Susan James (2010). Narrative as the Means to Freedom: Spinoza on the Uses of Imagination. In Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.), Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-12-24
Total downloads26 ( #53,693 of 739,215 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,337 of 739,215 )
How can I increase my downloads?