Spinoza on the Politics of PhilosophicalUnderstanding Susan James and Eric Schliesser Angels and Philosophers: with a New Interpretation of Spinoza's Common Notions

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):497-518 (2011)
In this paper I offer three main challenges to James (2011). All three turn on the nature of philosophy and secure knowledge in Spinoza. First, I criticize James's account of the epistemic role that experience plays in securing adequate ideas for Spinoza. In doing so I criticize her treatment of what is known as the ‘conatus doctrine’ in Spinoza in order to challenge her picture of the relationship between true religion and philosophy. Second, this leads me into a criticism of her account of the nature of philosophy in Spinoza. I argue it is less piecemeal and less akin to what we would recognize as ‘science’ than she suggests. Third, I argue against James's core commitment that Spinoza's three kinds of knowledge differ in degree; I claim they differ in kind. My argument will offer a new interpretation of Spinoza's conception of ‘common notions’. Moreover, I argue that Spinozistic adequate knowledge involves something akin to angelic disembodiment
Keywords Spinoza  Common Notions  Philosophy  Angels
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,997
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Jackson I. Cope (1956). Joseph Glanvill, Anglican Apologist. St. Louis,[Committee on Publications, Washington University].

View all 10 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Susan James (2009). Law and Sovereignty in Spinoza's Politics. In Moira Gatens (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza. Pennsylvania State University Press. 211--28.
Francesca di Poppa (2009). Abraham Cohen Herrera. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):491-507.
Colin Marshall (2012). Spinoza on Destroying Passions with Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):139-160.
Willi Goetschel (2003). Heine's Spinoza. Idealistic Studies 33 (2/3):203-217.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

45 ( #44,027 of 1,410,035 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #28,515 of 1,410,035 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.