Science, truth, and ordinary language
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (1):27-44 (1966)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAvner Baz (2012). When Words Are Called For: A Defense of Ordinary Language Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Avner Baz (2012). When Words Are Called For: In Defense of Ordinary Language. Harvard University Press.
Hans Sluga (2007). Truth and the Imperfection of Language. Grazer Philosophische Studien 75 (1):1-26.
Hilary Putnam (1957). Psychological Concepts, Explication, and Ordinary Language. Journal of Philosophy 54 (February):94-99.
Edward Mackinnon (1982). The Truth of Scientific Claims. Philosophy of Science 49 (3):437-462.
Peter Roeper (2010). Reasoning with Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (3).
Richard H. Schlagel (1962). Language and Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 23 (December):192-204.
Sally Parker Ryan (2010). Reconsidering Ordinary Language Philosophy: Malcolm’s (Moore’s) Ordinary Language Argument. Essays in Philosophy 11 (2):123-149.
Oswald Hanfling (2000). Philosophy and Ordinary Language: The Bent and Genius of Our Tongue. Routledge.
Richard G. Heck Jr (2004). Truth and Disquotation. Synthese 142 (3):317 - 352.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,800 of 549,549 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,549 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
