Spacetime the one substance

Philosophical Studies 145 (1):131 - 148 (2009)
What is the relation between material objects and spacetime regions? Supposing that spacetime regions are one sort of substance, there remains the question of whether or not material objects are a second sort of substance. This is the question of dualistic versus monistic substantivalism. I will defend the monistic view. In particular, I will maintain that material objects should be identified with spacetime regions. There is the spacetime manifold, and the fundamental properties are pinned directly to it
Keywords Spacetime  Substantivalism  Supersubstantivalism  Monism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/27734469
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
David J. Chalmers (2002). Does Conceivability Entail Possibility? In Tamar S. Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press 145--200.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Louis deRosset (2010). Getting Priority Straight. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):73 - 97.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

327 ( #2,864 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

80 ( #16,941 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.