Graduate studies at Western
Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):295-307 (2003)
|Abstract||This paper explores the usefulness of the 'ethical matrix', proposed by Ben Mepham, as a tool in technology assessment, specifically in food ethics. We consider what the matrix is, how it might be useful as a tool in ethical decision-making, and what drawbacks might be associated with it. We suggest that it is helpful for fact-finding in ethical debates relating to food ethics; but that it is much less helpful in terms of weighing the different ethical problems that it uncovers. Despite this drawback, we maintain that, with some modifications, the ethical matrix can be a useful tool in debates in food ethics. We argue that useful modifications might be to include future generations amongst the stakeholders in the matrix, and to substitute the principle of solidarity for the principle of justice|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ben Mepham (2000). A Framework for the Ethical Analysis of Novel Foods: The Ethical Matrix. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):165-176.
Matthias Kaiser, Kate Millar, Erik Thorstensen & Sandy Tomkins (2007). Developing the Ethical Matrix as a Decision Support Framework: GM Fish as a Case Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (1):65-80.
Matthias Kaiser & Ellen-Marie Forsberg (2001). Assessing Fisheries – Using an Ethical Matrix in a Participatory Process. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):191-200.
Peter Sandøe (2011). Facilitating Ethical Reflection Among Scientists Using the Ethical Matrix. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):425-445.
Matti Häyry (2000). How to Apply Ethical Principles to the Biotechnological Production of Food – the Case of Bovine Growth Hormone. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):177-184.
Kriton Grigorakis (2010). Ethical Issues in Aquaculture Production. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (4):345-370.
David Wright (2011). A Framework for the Ethical Impact Assessment of Information Technology. Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):199-226.
Karsten Jensen, Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Christian Gamborg, Kate Millar & Peter Sandøe (2011). Facilitating Ethical Reflection Among Scientists Using the Ethical Matrix. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):425-445.
Armin Grunwald (2004). The Normative Basis of (Health) Technology Assessment and the Role of Ethical Expertise. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):175-193.
Kate Millar & Sandy Tomkins (2007). Ethical Analysis of the Use of GM Fish: Emerging Issues for Aquaculture Development. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):437-453.
Alfred Driessen (2009). Ethical Aspects of Research in Ultrafast Communication. In Paul Sollie & Marcus Düwell (eds.), Evaluating New Technologies: Methodological Problems for the Ethical Assessment of Technology Developments. Springer.
Ellen-Marie Forsberg (2007). Value Pluralism and Coherentist Justification of Ethical Advice. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (1):81-97.
Christopher Grau (2005). Bad Dreams, Evil Demons, and the Experience Machine: Philosophy and The Matrix. In Christopher Grau (ed.), Philosophers Explore The Matrix. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Crane (2001). Unpacking the Ethical Product. Journal of Business Ethics 30 (4):361 - 373.
Stefan Aerts, Dirk Lips, Stuart Spencer, Eddy Decuypere & Johan De Tavernier (2006). A New Framework for the Assessment of Animal Welfare: Integrating Existing Knowledge From a Practical Ethics Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):67-76.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads12 ( #101,269 of 739,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,401 )
How can I increase my downloads?