David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Compass 4 (5):734-743 (2009)
Can there be a philosophy of taste? This paper opens by raising some metaphilosophical questions about the study of taste – what it consists of and what method we should adopt in pursuing it. It is suggested that the best starting point for philosophising about taste is against the background of 18th-century epistemology and philosophy of mind, and the conceptual tools this new philosophical paradigm entails. The notion of aesthetic taste in particular, which emerges from a growing sense of dissatisfaction with an undifferentiated category of taste, comes to be set apart from gustatory taste on account of its normativity and aspirations to objectivity. The paradox of taste, as found in Hume and Kant, is examined, and shown to be highly relevant to contemporary metaphysical debate within aesthetics. Specifically, this paper argues that both Realists and Anti-Realists rely more heavily than assumed on the idea of taste.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Locke (2008/1995). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Nagel (1986). The View From Nowhere. Oxford University Press.
Immanuel Kant (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Frank Sibley (1959). Aesthetic Concepts. Philosophical Review 68 (4):421-450.
Malcolm Budd (2003). The Acquaintance Principle. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):386-392.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James Shelley (2004). Hume's Principles of Taste: A Reply to Dickie. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
Robin James (2009). In but Not of, of but Not In: On Taste, Hipness, and White Embodiment. Contemporary Aesthetics 2 (Aesthetics and Race).
Henry E. Allison (2001). Kant's Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Béatrice Longuenesse (2003). Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste". Inquiry 46 (2):143 – 163.
Andrew Chignell (2007). Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):415 – 433.
George Dickie (1996). The Century of Taste: The Philosophical Odyssey of Taste in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford University Press.
Theodore Gracyk (2011). Delicacy in Hume's Theory of Taste. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):1-16.
Michael J. Shaffer (2007). Taste, Gastronomic Expertise and Objectivity. In Fritz Allhoff & David Monroe (eds.), Food & Philosophy. Blackwell
Kevin Melchionne (2010). On the Old Saw “I Know Nothing About Art but I Know What I Like". Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):131-141.
Kevin Melchionne, Acquired Taste. Contemporary Aesthetics.
Added to index2009-08-27
Total downloads155 ( #22,686 of 1,792,085 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #73,240 of 1,792,085 )
How can I increase my downloads?