David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 46 (4):413 – 448 (2003)
Because of a widespread criticism of the Enlightenment sense of reason for its unilateral privileging of unity and its solipsistic conception of the thinking subject, many turn to postmodern difference as a remedy. But an alternative can also be found in a renewed appropriation of the tradition. This essay is an attempt at such an appropriation, through a philosophical analysis of Heraclitus' conception of logos. A new interpretation of Heraclitus is offered, which affirms the equiprimordiality of unity and difference. This view is shown to have implications first of all for the mode of reasoning: thought, in its most genuine sense, cannot be accomplished in isolation but is an essentially joint act. Further, the view has implications for the content or object of thought: the 'seat' of intelligibility is not the abstract idea which the mind assimilates to itself but rather the concrete whole, the complex 'one-many' structure in the world, in which minds constitutively participate. An attempt is made, at the end of the essay, to show how the convergence of form and content, and the concrete sense of rationality it implies, comes to dramatic expression in Heraclitus' style.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mantas Adomenas (1999). Heraclitus on Religion. Phronesis 44 (2):87-113.
Ammon Allred (2009). The Divine Logos. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):1-18.
Dror Post (2009). Heraclitus's Hope for the Unhoped. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):229-240.
Martin Heidegger (1975/1984). Early Greek Thinking. Harper & Row.
M. R. Wright (1981). Heraclitus Re-Edited Charles H. Kahn: The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. An Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Pp. Xiv + 354. Cambridge University Press, 1979. £15. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 31 (01):53-55.
Charles H. Kahn (1979). The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: An Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #62,129 of 1,699,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,935 of 1,699,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?