David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 21 (1):35-52 (2011)
This article seeks to broaden contemporary scholarship on the Lotus S?tra by arguing that it is a philosophically critical, self-reflective text struggling with problems of truth in Buddhist discourse. While all Lotus S?tra scholars agree that the doctrine of skillful means is a central teaching in the text, there is a common tendency to frame skillful means as a passive vehicle (or ?means?) for expressing truth rather than an active philosophical critique of truth. This article argues that the Lotus S?tra uses skillful means as a distinct form of criticism within a larger debate over the nature and efficacy of Buddhist practice, and that it raises important issues about truth that are shared by other important Buddhist thinkers and texts such as N?g?rjuna, Lin-chi and the Vimalak?rtinirde?a. It analyzes key passages and parables without reducing the ethical teachings of the Lotus S?tra to simplistic versions of utilitarianism, paternalism, or relativism, and without dissolving the critical elements that make the Lotus S?tra a genuinely philosophically interesting text
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Asaf Federman (2009). Literal Means and Hidden Meanings: A New Analysis of Skillful Means. Philosophy East and West 59 (2):pp. 125-141.
Karel Werner (2004). On the Nature and Message of the Lotus Sūtra in the Light of Early Buddhism and Buddhist Scholarship (Towards the Beginnings of Mahāyāna). Asian Philosophy 14 (3):209-221.
John Schroeder (2000). Nāgārjuna and the Doctrine of "Skillful Means". Philosophy East and West 50 (4):559-583.
Lucinda Joy Peach (2002). Social Responsibility, Sex Change, and Salvation: Gender Justice in the "Lotus Sūtra". Philosophy East and West 52 (1):50-74.
A. L. Herman (1997). The Way of the Lotus: Critical Reflections on the Ethics of the Saddharmapundarika S Tra. Asian Philosophy 7 (1):5 – 22.
Anna Ghiglione (2009). Deception in Chinese Buddhist Thinking : Reflections From the Lotus Sutra and the Vimalakirti Sutra. In Leslie Anne Boldt-Irons, Corrado Federici & Ernesto Virgulti (eds.), Disguise, Deception, Trompe-L'oeil: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Peter Lang. 99--285.
Wen Haiming (2011). Two Versions of Desire-Based Subjectivism: A Comparative Study of the Analects and the Lotus Sutra. Asian Philosophy 21 (4):419 - 435.
Karel Werner (2004). On the Nature and Message of the Lotus Stra in the Light of Early Buddhism and Buddhist Scholarship (Towards the Beginnings of Mahāyāna). Asian Philosophy 14 (3):209 – 221.
Tsugunari Kubo (1988). The Philosophical Foundation of the Lay Buddhist Practice of the Reiyukai, as Depicted in the Lotus Sūtra. Reiyukai.
An-yi Pan (2008). Shaping the Lotus Sutra: Buddhist Visual Culture in Medieval China – by Eugene Y. Wang. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35 (1):182–185.
William Edelglass (2006). Moral Pluralism, Skillful Means, and Environmental Ethics. Environmental Philosophy 3 (2):8-16.
Lepekhova E. S. (2008). The Concept of Virtue in Compositions of Prince Shotoku. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 6:185-194.
Joseph Grange (2001). The Lotus Sutra and Whitehead's Last Writings. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 28 (4):385–398.
Gene Reeves (2001). Divinity in Process Thought and the Lotus Sutra. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 28 (4):357–369.
Added to index2011-02-19
Total downloads29 ( #49,670 of 1,003,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #38,982 of 1,003,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?