The Difference Between Moral and Rational “Oughts”: An Expressivist Account

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):159-174 (2012)
Abstract
Morality and rationality are both normative: the moral claim “you ought to help others” is a genuine normative judgment, as well as the rational maxim “you ought to brush your teeth twice a day”. But it seems that there is a crucial difference these two judgments. In the first part of this paper, I argue that this difference is to be understood as a difference between two kinds of normativity: demanding and recommending normativity. But the crucial task is, of course, to explain the difference. In the second part of this paper, I suggest that metaethical expressivists can provide a good explanation: by extending the analysis of ordinary (non-normative) demands and recommendations to normative judgments, they can formulate a convincing account that captures the key differences between morality and rationality
Keywords Metaethics  Normativity  Expressivism  Moral judgments  Rationality  Speech acts
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,322
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Michael Bratman (1987/1999). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Center for the Study of Language and Information.

View all 13 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Brian T. Trainor (2003). Foucault and the Politics of Difference. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (5):563-580.
Jan Bransen (1998). True to Ourselves. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):67 – 85.
Cruz González-Ayesta (2007). Scotus's Interpretation of Metaphysics 9.2. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:217-230.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-04-14

Total downloads

71 ( #18,633 of 1,096,498 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #62,479 of 1,096,498 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.