David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):85-113 (2000)
This article considers complications for the principle in Descartes that effects are similar to their causes that are connected to his own denial that terms apply "univocally" to God and the creatures He produces. Descartes suggested that there remains an "analogical" relation in virtue of which our mind can be said to be similar to God's. However, this suggestion is undermined by the implication of his doctrine of the creation of the eternal truths that God's will differs entirely from our own. The disappearance of analogy is even more evident in Spinoza and Regis. Both linked Descartes's doctrine to the principle that an effect differs from its cause with respect to what it receives from that cause, and both argued from that principle to the conclusion that we differ from God in both essence and existence
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Geoffrey Gorham (2003). Descartes's Dilemma of Eminent Containment. Dialogue 42 (01):3-.
Patricia Easton (2009). What is at Stake in the Cartesian Debates on the Eternal Truths? Philosophy Compass 4 (2):348-362.
Similar books and articles
P. -F. Moreau (1988). Les Enjeux de la Publication En France des Papiers de Leibniz Sur Spinoza. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 93 (2):215 - 222.
Gideon Segal (2000). Beyond Subjectivity: Spinoza's Cognitivism of the Emotions. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1):1 – 19.
M. T. (2003). Cartesian Causation: Body-Body Interaction, Motion, and Eternal Truths. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):737-762.
Walter Ott (2008). Régis's Scholastic Mechanism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):2-14.
Tad M. Schmaltz (2002). Review: Learning From Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (442):367-373.
Jonathan Bennett (1965). A Note on Descartes and Spinoza. Philosophical Review 74 (3):379-380.
Edwin M. Curley (2001). The Immortality of the Soul in Descartes and Spinoza. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75 (27-41):27-41.
Stephen P. Turner & Regis A. Factor (1990). The Disappearance of Tradition in Weber. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 15 (1):400-424.
Tad M. Schmaltz (2002). Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
Dennis Des Chene (2003). Life After Descartes: Régis on Generation. Perspectives on Science 11 (4):410-420.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #203,298 of 1,911,604 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #81,004 of 1,911,604 )
How can I increase my downloads?