Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):89- (2013)
|Abstract||The thesis of theory-ladenness of observations, in its various guises, is widely considered as either ill-conceived or harmless to the rationality of science. The latter view rests partly on the work of the proponents of New Experimentalism who have argued, among other things, that experimental practices are efficient in guarding against any epistemological threat posed by theory-ladenness. In this paper I show that one can generate a thesis of theory-ladenness for experimental practices from an influential New Experimentalist account. The notion I introduce for this purpose is the concept of ‘theory-driven data reliability judgments’ (TDR), according to which theories which are sought to be tested with a particular set of data guide reliability judgments about those very same data. I provide various prominent historical examples (among others, the confirmation of Einstein’s prediction of star light bending in 1919) to show that TDRs are used by scientists to resolve data conflicts. I argue that the rationality of the practices which employ TDRs can be saved if the independent support of the theories driving TDRs is construed in a particular way.|
|Keywords||Theoretical virtues Theory-ladenness Experiment|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Samuel Schindler (2011). Bogen and Woodward's Data-Phenomena Distinction, Forms of Theory-Ladenness, and the Reliability of Data. Synthese 182 (1):39-55.
William F. Brewer & Bruce L. Lambert (2001). The Theory-Ladenness of Observation and the Theory-Ladenness of the Rest of the Scientific Process. Philosophy of Science 3 (September):S176-S186.
Michael A. Bishop (1992). Theory-Ladenness of Perception Arguments. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:287 - 299.
Jaakko Hintikka (1992). Theory-Ladenness of Observations as a Test Case of Kuhn's Approach to Scientific Inquiry. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:277 - 286.
Koray Karaca, Theory Construction and Experimentation in High Energy Particle Physics, Circa 1960-1970.
K. P. (2003). Theory-Ladenness of Evidence: A Case Study From History of Chemistry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):351-368.
William B. Jones (1978). Theory-Ladenness and Theory Comparison. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:83 - 92.
Matthias Adam (2004). Why Worry About Theory-Dependence? Circularity, Minimal Empiricality and Reliability. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (2 & 3):117 – 132.
Matthias Adam, Theoriebeladenheit Und Objektivität. Zur Rolle Von Beobachtungen in den Naturwissenschaften.
Bjørn Hofmann (2002). Technological Medicine and the Autonomy of Man. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):157-167.
Bruce Glymour (2000). Data and Phenomena: A Distinction Reconsidered. Erkenntnis 52 (1):29-37.
Marco Buzzoni (1997). Erkenntnistheoretische Und Ontologische Probleme der Theoretischen Begriffe. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (1):19-53.
Ragnar Fjelland (1991). The Theory-Ladenness of Observations, the Role of Scientific Instruments, and the Kantian a Priori. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):269 – 280.
Added to index2012-10-26
Total downloads11 ( #99,430 of 548,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #6,725 of 548,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?