The Neurotechnological Cerebral Subject: Persistence of Implicit and Explicit Gender Norms in a Network of Change
Neuroethics (Browse Results) (forthcoming)
|Abstract||Abstract Under the realm of neurocultures the concept of the cerebral subject emerges as the central category to define the self, socio-cultural interaction and behaviour. The brain is the reference for explaining cognitive processes and behaviour but at the same time the plastic brain is situated in current paradigms of (self)optimization on the market of meritocracy by means of neurotechnologies. This paper explores whether neurotechnological apparatuses may—due to their hybridity and malleability—bear potentials for a change in gender based attributions that have been historically legitimized by apparently natural differences between women and men. Or, in contrast, which gendered ascriptions are (again) produced in theories and applications according to the normative demands for the bio-techno-social cerebral subject situated in neoliberal power relations. An exploration of three main fields of current developments, the neurotechnological apparatus of brain-computer-interfaces, the technologies for brain tuning and the discourses in neuroeconomics, reveals first insights on these gender aspects in reliance with the ethical/political debate. Moreover, this paper concretizes questions for further research on gender and ethical aspects in the field of neurotechnologies. Content Type Journal Article Category Original Paper Pages 1-14 DOI 10.1007/s12152-011-9129-1 Authors Sigrid Schmitz, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Cultural and Social Anthropology, University of Vienna, Alserstraße 23/22, 1080 Vienna, Austria Journal Neuroethics Online ISSN 1874-5504 Print ISSN 1874-5490|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robyn Bluhm (2013). New Research, Old Problems: Methodological and Ethical Issues in fMRI Research Examining Sex/Gender Differences in Emotion Processing. Neuroethics 6 (2):319-330.
Femke Nijboer, Jens Clausen, Brendan Allison & Pim Haselager (forthcoming). The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders' Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing. Neuroethics.
J. Butler (2004). Undoing Gender. Routledge.
James Giordano (2013). Unpacking Neuroscience and Neurotechnology - Instructions Not Included: Neuroethics Required. Neuroethics 6 (2):411-414.
Cayce Hook & Martha Farah (2013). Neuroscience for Educators: What Are They Seeking, and What Are They Finding? Neuroethics 6 (2):331-341.
Catherine Vidal (2012). The Sexed Brain: Between Science and Ideology. Neuroethics 5 (3):295-303.
Richard F. Curtis & Patricia MacCorquodale (1990). Stability and Change in Gender Relations. Sociological Theory 8 (2):136-152.
Thomas Johnson (forthcoming). Review of Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen and Guy Kahane Eds., Enhancing Human Capacities. [REVIEW] Neuroethics (Browse Results).
Simon Outram (forthcoming). Ethical Considerations in the Framing of the Cognitive Enhancement Debate. Neuroethics (Browse Results).
Hilde Corneliussen (2011). Gender-Technology Relations: Exploring Stability and Change. Palgrave Macmillan.
Françoise Baylis (forthcoming). “I Am Who I Am”: On the Perceived Threats to Personal Identity From Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuroethics.
J. Wallach Scott (2010). Gender: Still a Useful Category of Analysis? Diogenes 57 (1):7-14.
Jan-Hendrik Heinrichs (2012). The Sensitivity of Neuroimaging Data. Neuroethics 5 (2):185-195.
Bruce Maxwell & Eric Racine (forthcoming). The Ethics of Neuroeducation: Research, Practice and Policy. Neuroethics (Browse Results).
Added to index2011-06-23
Total downloads13 ( #88,037 of 549,683 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,683 )
How can I increase my downloads?