Graduate studies at Western
Mind and Language (forthcoming)
|Abstract||This paper provides a theory of the nature of symbols in the language of thought (LOT). My discussion consists in three parts. In part one, I provide three arguments for the individuation of primitive symbols in terms of total computational role. The first of these arguments claims that Classicism requires that primitive symbols be typed in this manner; no other theory of typing will suffice. The second argument contends that without this manner of symbol individuation, there will be computational processes that fail to supervene on syntax, together with the rules of composition and the computational algorithms. The third argument says that cognitive science needs a natural kind that is typed by total computational role. Otherwise, either cognitive science will be incomplete, or its laws will have counterexamples. Then, part two defends this view from a criticism, offered by both Jerry Fodor and Jesse Prinz, who respond to my view with the charge that because the types themselves are individuated.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Angelo Cangelosi (2001). Evolution of Communication and Language Using Signals, Symbols and Words. [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)].
Murat Aydede (2000). Computation and Intentional Psychology. Dialogue 39 (2):365-379.
Susan Schneider (2009). LOT, CTM, and the Elephant in the Room. Synthese 170 (2):235 - 250.
Vincent C. Müller (2009). Symbol Grounding in Computational Systems: A Paradox of Intentions. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 19 (4):529-541.
Christopher D. Viger (2001). Locking on to the Language of Thought. Philosophical Psychology 14 (2):203-215.
Jay L. Garfield (1997). Mentalese Not Spoken Here: Computation, Cognition, and Causation. Philosophical Psychology 10 (4):413-35.
William P. Bechtel (1994). Natural Deduction in Connectionist Systems. Synthese 101 (3):433-463.
D. Bellé & F. Parlamento (2006). Truth in V for Ǝ ∀∀-Sentences Is Decidable. Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (4):1200 - 1222.
Susan Schneider (2009). The Nature of Symbols in the Language of Thought. Mind and Language 24 (5):523-553.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads115 ( #5,909 of 725,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #13,420 of 725,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?