Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (6):573-587 (1992)
|Abstract||Using the right to die and the United States Supreme Court case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health as exemplars, this article explores the notion of third-order decisionmaking. If first order decisionmaking is about what should happen, and second-order decisionmaking is about who should decide what should happen, then third-order decisionmaking is about who should decide who decides. This turns out to be an apt characterization of constitutionalism, which is centrally concerned with the allocation of responsibility for making decisions about the allocation of responsibility. Deference to erroneous second-order decisions, as in the Cruzan case itself, may merely be an example of this central feature of constitutionalism. Keywords: constitutionalism, Cruzan case, right-to-die, rules CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hedley Bull (2012). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia University Press.
Matthew Broome, Lisa Bortolotti & Matteo Mameli (2010). Moral Responsibility and Mental Illness: A Case Study. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (19):179-187.
Ellen H. Moskowitz (1996). Moral Consensus in Public Ethics: Patient Autonomy and Family Decisionmaking in the Work of One State Bioethics Commission. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):149-168.
David C. Thomasma (1994). Clinical Ethics as Medical Hermeneutics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (2).
Jean D'Aspremont & Frédéric Dopagne, Two Constitutionalisms in Europe: Pursuing an Articulation of the European and International Legal Orders.
Henrik R. Wulff (1986). Rational Diagnosis and Treatment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (2):123-134.
Thomas Halper (1996). Privacy and Autonomy: From Warren and Brandeis to Roe and Cruzan. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):121-135.
James Lindemann Nelson (1994). Publicity and Pricelessness: Grassroots Decisionmaking and Justice in Rationing. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (4):333-342.
Added to index2010-08-22
Total downloads7 ( #142,281 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?