The Viability of the Philosophical Novel: The Case of Simone de Beauvoir's She Came to Stay
Hypatia (forthcoming)
| Abstract | This article begins by asking if the project to write a philosophical novel is not inherently flawed; it would seem that the novelist must either write an ambiguous text, which would not create a strong enough argument to count as philosophy, or she must write a text with a clear argument, which would not be ambiguous enough to count as good fiction. The only other option available would be to exemplify a preexisting abstract philosophical system in the concrete literary world. To move beyond such an impasse, this article turns to the work of Simone de Beauvoir. Beauvoir's unique aesthetic theory in “Literature and Metaphysics” envisions philosophy as an integral part of the literary text and sees the novel not as an argument but as something called a “philosophical appeal” (Beauvoir 2004b). In her first novel, She Came to Stay, such a concept of the philosophical novel allows Beauvoir to make an original contribution to the philosophical tradition—one in which Beauvoir rethinks the problem of solipsism—while still creating a stunning literary work (Beauvoir 1954). A study of the theory and the novel together thus provides a solid understanding of what philosophers stand to gain from the philosophical novel | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEmily R. Grosholz (ed.) (2006). The Legacy of Simone de Beauvoir. Clarendon Press.
Nancy Bauer (1999). The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Gendered Phenomenologies, Erotic Generosities, And: Sex and Existence: Simone de Beauvoir's 'The Second Sex', And: Beauvoir and The Second Sex : Feminism, Race, and the Origins of Existentialism, And: Philosophy as Passion: The Thinking of Simone de Beauvoir (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (4):688-691.
Sara Heinämaa (1999). Simone de Beauvoir’s Phenomenology of Sexual Difference. Hypatia 14 (4):114-132.
Dennis A. Gilbert (2012). Simone de Beauvoir on Existentialist Theater. Sartre Studies International 18 (2):107-126.
Claudia Card (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Simone De Beauvoir. Cambridge University Press.
Edward Fullbrook (1999). She Came to Stay and Being and Nothingness. Hypatia 14 (4):50 - 69.
Simone De Beauvoir (2004). A Review of the Phenomenology of Perception. [REVIEW] In Margaret A. Simons (ed.), Simone de Beauvoir: Philosophical Writings. University of Illinois Press.
Sally J. Scholz (2010). That All Children Should Be Free: Beauvoir, Rousseau, and Childhood. Hypatia 25 (2):394-411.
Nancy Bauer (2004). Must We Read Simone de Beauvoir? In Emily Grosholz (ed.), The Legacy of Simone de Beauvoir.
Simone De Beauvoir, Margaret A. Simons & Jane Marie Todd (1989). Two Interviews with Simone de Beauvoir. Hypatia 3 (3):11 - 27.
Zeynep Direk (2011). Immanence and Abjection in Simone de Beauvoir. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):49-72.
Ulrika Björk (2010). Paradoxes of Femininity in the Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):39-60.
Anne Morgan (2008). Simone de Beauvoir's Ethics of Freedom and Absolute Evil. Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 75-89.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-05-12Total downloads11 ( #99,650 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,917 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
