What Finitism Could Not Be (Lo que el finitismo no podría ser)
Crítica 35 (103):43 - 68 (2003)
| Abstract | In his paper "Finitism" (1981), W.W. Tait maintains that the chief difficulty for everyone who wishes to understand Hilbert's conception of finitist mathematics is this: to specify the sense of the provability of general statements about the natural numbers without presupposing infinite totalities. Tait further argues that all finitist reasoning is essentially primitive recursive. In this paper, we attempt to show that his thesis "The finitist functions are precisely the primitive recursive functions" is disputable and that another, likewise defended by him, is untenable. The second thesis is that the finitist theorems are precisely the universal closures of the equations that can be proved in PRA. /// En su articulo "Finitism" (1981), W.W. Tait sostiene que la dificultad principal para quien quiere comprender la concepción hilbertiana de la matemática finitista es ésta: especificar el sentido de la demostrabilidad de enunciados generales sobre los números naturales sin presuponer totalidades infinitas. Además, Tait argumenta que todo razonamiento finitista es esencialmente primitivo recursivo. En este artículo tratamos de mostrar que su tesis "Las funciones finitistas son precisamente las funciones primitivas recursivas" es discutible y que otra, también defendida por él, resulta insostenible. La segunda tesis es que los teoremas finitistas son precisamente las clausuras universales de las ecuaciones que pueden demostrarse en PRA. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
W. W. Tait (2010). Gödel on Intuition and on Hilbert's Finitism. In Kurt Gödel, Solomon Feferman, Charles Parsons & Stephen G. Simpson (eds.), Kurt Gödel: Essays for His Centennial. Association for Symbolic Logic.
Vitali Tselishchev (2008). Intuition and Reality of Signs. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 41:57-63.
J. P. Bendegem (2012). A Defense of Strict Finitism. Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):141-149.
Karin Edvardsson Björnberg (2009). What Relations Can Hold Among Goals, and Why Does It Matter? (¿Qué Relaciones Se Sostienen Entre Metas y Por Qué Esto Importa?). Crítica 41 (121):47 - 66.
Ofra Magidor (2007). Strict Finitism Refuted? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (1pt3):403-411.
Matthias Schirn & Karl-Georg Niebergall (2001). Extensions of the Finitist Point of View. History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (3):135-161.
Joan Pagès (2001). EI Realismo Nómico de Universales: Algunos Problemas (Nomical Universal Realism: Some Problems). Theoria 16 (3):559-582.
Pedro Ramos (1997). El Argumento de la Identidad Y la Nominación de Funciones En Frege (the Argument on Identity Statements and the Problem of Referring to Functions in Frege's Philosophy). Theoria 12 (2):293-315.
Manuel Comesaña (2001). ¿Tiene Derecho a Existir la Filosofía de la Ciencia? The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:151-157.
Mathieu Marion (1995). Wittgenstein and Finitism. Synthese 105 (2):141 - 176.
Manuel Pérez Otero (2000). EI Argumento Antiintelectualista de Wittgenstein Sobre la Comprensión Del Lenguaje (Wittgenstein's Antiintellectualist Argument About Linguistic Understanding). Theoria 15 (1):155-169.
Manuel Perez Otero (2000). El Argumento Antiintelectualista de Wittgenstein sobre la Comprensión del Lenguaje (Wittgenstein's Antiintellectualist Argument about Linguistic Understanding). Theoria 15 (1):155-169.
Eleonora Orlando (2008). Fictional Names Without Fictional Objects (Ficción Sin Metafísica). Crítica 40 (120):111 - 127.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads21 ( #58,746 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |

