What fools we were
The Philosopher's Magazine (49):93-97 (2010)
| Abstract | Don didn’t grasp what would eventually come to be one of the most successful ad campaigns ever because he didn’t recognise the person presenting the evidence as being appropriately trustworthy. He failed to know because Dr Guttman’s say-so was not enough to provide justification for a belief. But why would he think that? To get to the bottom of this, we need the help of an analytical approach known as standpoint theory | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDon Douglas Stewart (1972). Fakes, Frauds, and Fools. Miracle Valley, Ariz.,Don Stewart Evangelistic Assoc..
Louis E. Howe (2006). Review: Schooling Citizens Amid Commerce, Fools, and Dilettantes. [REVIEW] Political Theory 34 (5):634 - 640.
Maria Carmela Agodi (1991). Rational Fools or Foolish Rationalists?: Bringing Meaning Back In. Sociological Theory 9 (2):199-205.
Amartya K. Sen (1977). Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):317-344.
Charles J. Quirk (1945). Despite Fools' Laughter. Thought 20 (4):717-717.
James Edward Tobin (1944). The Ship of Fools. Thought 19 (3):542-544.
John P. McIntyre (1963). “Ship of Fools” and Its Publicity. Thought 38 (2):211-220.
T. D. Seymour (1902). On Plato's Ship of Fools. The Classical Review 16 (08):385-387.
Debra Nails (1985). Of Children, Fools and Madmen. Southwest Philosophy Review 2:30-42.
Mladen Turk (2012). The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life Edited by Robert Trivers. Zygon 47 (3):650-652.
Iona Tarrant & James Tarrant (2004). Satisfied Fools: Using J. S. Mill's Notion of Utility to Analyse the Impact of Vocationalism in Education Within a Democratic Society. Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (1):107–120.
Carlo Cellucci (2006). The Question Hume Didn't Ask: Why Should We Accept Deductive Inferences? In Carlo Cellucci & Paolo Pecere (eds.), Demonstrative and Non-Demonstrative Reasoning in Mathematics and Natural Science, pp. 137-165. Edizioni dell'Università di Cassino.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-12-02Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,125 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
