What fools we were

The Philosophers' Magazine 49 (49):93-97 (2010)
Abstract
Don didn’t grasp what would eventually come to be one of the most successful ad campaigns ever because he didn’t recognise the person presenting the evidence as being appropriately trustworthy. He failed to know because Dr Guttman’s say-so was not enough to provide justification for a belief. But why would he think that? To get to the bottom of this, we need the help of an analytical approach known as standpoint theory
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,404
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Don Douglas Stewart (1972). Fakes, Frauds, and Fools. Miracle Valley, Ariz.,Don Stewart Evangelistic Assoc..
T. D. Seymour (1902). On Plato's Ship of Fools. The Classical Review 16 (08):385-387.
Debra Nails (1985). Of Children, Fools and Madmen. Southwest Philosophy Review 2:30-42.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-02

Total downloads

4 ( #259,269 of 1,103,008 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #183,252 of 1,103,008 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.