David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 95 (1):95 - 106 (1993)
Philosophical discussions of depiction sometimes suffer from a lack of differentiation between several questions concerning the nature of pictorial representation. To provide a suitable framework I distinguish six such questions and several levels on which one might want to proceed in order to answer some of them. With this background, I reconstruct Goodman's and Elgin's answer to the specific question: What distinguishes the pictorial from the verbal or linguistic? I try to reveal some major motivations behind their system-oriented approach and to indicate some reasons why a strategy of this kind is to a certain extent mandatory to grasp the nature of the pictorial. The system-relative and functional character of depiction has to be captured by every adequate theory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anthony A. Derksen (2004). Occlusion Shapes and Sizes in a Theory of Depiction. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):319-341.
Alon Chasid (2007). Content-Free Pictorial Realism. Philosophical Studies 135 (3):375 - 405.
Dominic Gregory (2010). Pictures, Pictorial Contents and Vision. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):15-32.
John Hyman (2003). Subjectivism in the Theory of Pictorial Art. The Monist 86 (4):676 - 701.
Gavin McIntosh (2003). Depiction Unexplained: Peacocke and Hopkins on Pictorial Representation. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):279-288.
Flint Schier (1986). Deeper Into Pictures: An Essay on Pictorial Representation. Cambridge University Press.
Alon Chasid (2004). Why the Pictorial Relation is Not Reference. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (3):226-247.
M. Pettersson (2011). Seeing What Is Not There: Pictorial Experience, Imagination and Non-Localization. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):279-294.
Mark Rollins (1999). Pictorial Representation: When Cognitive Science Meets Aesthetics. Philosophical Psychology 12 (4):387 – 413.
Oliver Robert Scholz (2000). A Solid Sense of Syntax. Erkenntnis 52 (2):199-212.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #71,778 of 1,410,023 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #28,515 of 1,410,023 )
How can I increase my downloads?