Williamson on Our Ignorance in Borderline Cases

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):937 - 943 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Williamson on our ignorance in borderline cases.Review author[S.]: Stephen Schiffer - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):937-943.
On the epistemic status of borderline cases.Zoltán Vecsey - 2012 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 16 (1):179-184.
How to Respond to Borderline Cases.Dan López de Sa - 2010 - In Sebastiano Moruzzi & Richard Dietz (eds.), Cuts and Clouds. Oxford University Press.
Borderline cases and bivalence.Diana Raffman - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (1):1-31.
Truth, Falsity, and Borderline Cases.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophical Topics 28 (1):211-244.
Williamson on inexact knowledge.Anna Mahtani - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (2):171 - 180.
Higher-Order Sorites Paradox.Elia Zardini - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):25-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
34 (#434,396)

6 months
7 (#285,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Schiffer
New York University

Citations of this work

Williamson's master argument on vagueness.Greg Ray - 2004 - Synthese 138 (2):175-206.
The instability of vague terms.Anna Mahtani - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):570–576.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references