Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||In his short review of The Political Philosophy of Herbert Spencer , Timothy Virkkala (May 1999) praises Tim S. Gray's discussion of the great classical liberal's methodology as a synthesis of "individualist" and "holist" approaches to social theory. But Virkkala remarks This method -I'm tempted to call it "dialectical," but Spencer's prose and position seem so far from Hegel's that the term is almost indecent -confuses many readers. But it is surely his strength. Gray is one of the few Spencer scholars to see this method as fundamental, and to present sophisticated analyses of Spencer's syntheses. It is unfortunate that Virkkala refuses to give into his temptation, because crucially significant aspects of Herbert Spencer's work are, indeed, dialectical.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Herbert Spencer (1969). Herbert Spencer. London, Collier-Macmillan.
Robert Dingwall & Michael D. King (1995). Herbert Spencer and the Professions: Occupational Ecology Reconsidered. Sociological Theory 13 (1):14-24.
Edward Livingston Youmans (1973). Herbert Spencer on the Americans and the Americans on Herbert Spencer. New York,Arno Press.
Tim Gray (1988). Is Herbert Spencer's Law of Equal Freedom a Utilitarian or a Rights-Based Theory of Justice? Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (2):259-278.
William Sweet, Herbert Spencer. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
John Offer (2010). Herbert Spencer and Social Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
Patricia H. Werhane (2000). Business Ethics and the Origins of Contemporary Capitalism: Economics and Ethics in the Work of Adam Smith and Herbert Spencer. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 24 (3):185 - 198.
Added to index2009-02-16
Total downloads8 ( #131,938 of 740,802 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?