You are accessing PhilPapers from Open University (UK), an institution that is not subscribed to PhilPapers. Starting on July 1, 2014, we ask institutions that grant philosophy degrees and are based in high-GDP countries to contribute to PhilPapers' maintenance and development through a subscription. See this page for details. Please show your support by contacting your librarian.

Descartes, Madness and Method

Abstract
This paper replies to Fred Ablondi’s discussion of Descartes’s treatment of madness in the Meditations. Against Ablondi’s interpretation that Descartes never seriously takes on board the skeptical hypothesis that he might be mad, because to do so would be for him to undermine the logical thought processes required to realize his agenda in the Meditations, I contend that Descartes does employ madness as a skeptical device, by assimilating its skeptical essentials into the dream argument. I maintain that while Descartes does not use madness to undermine logical processes, he does adduce other considerations that reveal him to be prepared to see those processes undermined. On the question why Descartes abandons madness in the Meditations, I argue that, despite its attractiveness as a skeptical device, the madness hypothesis involves methodological shortcomings that render it unfit for service in the doubt
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,350
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Tom Vinci (2011). Argument and Persuasion in Descartes' Meditations. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):497-498.
Brad Chynoweth (2010). Descartes' Resolution of the Dreaming Doubt. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):153-179.
Fred Ablondi (2005). Almog's Descartes. Philosophy 80 (3):423-431.
John J. Conley (1994). The Silence of Descartes. Philosophy and Theology 8 (3):199-212.
Robert J. Yanal (2000). Rebecca 's Deceivers. Philosophy and Literature 24 (1):67-82.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-09

Total downloads

13 ( #116,720 of 1,096,707 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #105,642 of 1,096,707 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.