David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 39 (02):360- (1989)
Illusions play a central part in Epicurean philosophy. One of its fundamental assumptions is that men are the victims of a certain grand illusion and, as long as they remain so, can never aspire to a happy life. This is the illusion that pleasures can be increased in intensity without limit. It is as a result of this that men go to enormous lengths to enlarge their capacity to procure more pleasure, struggling in pursuit of goals that can rarely, if ever, be achieved. But here mankind has made a disastrous mistake: the limit of pleasure is reached with the removal of pain, and after that point it cannot be increased, only varied. The illusion has therefore led to a tragic state of affairs, a sad history of fruitless war, struggle and ambition and it is a vital part of Epicurus’ programme to rid men of this evil by teaching them the true limits of pleasure
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Thrasher (2013). Reconciling Justice and Pleasure in Epicurean Contractarianism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):423-436.
Terence Rajivan Edward (2011). Theory-Laden Experience and Illusions. Ethos: Felsefe ve Toplumsal Bilimlerde Diyaloglar 4 (2):58-67.
Jeffrey Fish & Kirk R. Sanders (eds.) (2011). Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge University Press.
E. C. (2000). The Illusions of Scientists Vs. The Illusions of Social Epistemologists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
Monte Ransome Johnson (2003). Was Gassendi an Epicurean? History of Philosophy Quarterly 20 (4):339 - 360.
Thomas Nadelhoffer & Tatyana Matveeva (2009). Positive Illusions, Perceived Control and the Free Will Debate. Mind and Language 24 (5):495-522.
Carlos E. Vasco (2000). The Illusions of Scientists Vs. The Illusions of Social Epistemologists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
Eldon C. Wait (1997). Dissipating Illusions. Human Studies 20 (2):221-242.
Robert Briscoe (2010). Perceiving the Present: Systematization of Illusions or Illusion of Systematization? Cognitive Science 34 (8):1530-1542.
Roberto Casati (2012). Towards a Synchretist Theory of Depiction (How to Account for the Illusionistic Aspect of Pictorial Mirrors, Illusions and Epistemic Innocence). In Clotilde Calabi (ed.), Perceptual Illusions: Philosophical and Psychological Essays.
Daniel J. Kirchner (2010). Augustine's Use of Epicureanism. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):183-200.
Casey O'Callaghan (2006). Cross-Modal Illusions and Perceptual Content: Lessons From Cross-Modal Illusions. Electroneurobiolog 14 (2):211-224.
Michael Erler (1995). Diogenes the Epicurean M. F. Smith: Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription. Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Notes. (La Scuola di Epicuro Collezione di Testi Ercolanesi Diretta da Marcello Gigante Supplemento, 1.) Pp. 660; 18 Figs., (Maps, Photographs). Naples: Bibliopolis, 1993. L. 200,000. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (01):22-24.
Mikel Burley (2010). Epicurus, Death, and the Wrongness of Killing. Inquiry 53 (1):68-86.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads18 ( #216,683 of 1,934,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,469 of 1,934,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?