David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):581-604 (2008)
The subject of this paper is Malebranche’s relation to Descartes on the question of method. Using recent commentary as a springboard, it examines whether Malebranche advances a nonpsychologistic account of method, in contrast to the psychologism typically thought to characterize the Cartesian view. I explore this question with respect to two issues of central importance to method generally: doubt and free will. My argument is that, despite superficial differences of emphasis, Descartes and Malebranche adopt positions on doubt and free will that effectively ensure that their respective accounts of method aresubstantially the same
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steven M. Nadler (ed.) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche. Cambridge University Press.
Antonia Lolordo (2005). Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation and the Nature of the Mind. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.
Andrew Pyle (2003). Malebranche. Routledge.
A. Raftopoulos (2003). Cartesian Analysis and Synthesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):265-308.
Tad M. Schmaltz (1996). Malebranche's Theory of the Soul: A Cartesian Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Christopher P. Satoor, A Question Concerning Descartes: The Method of Doubt and The Mind/Body Problem.
Constance Blackwell (2009). Part Four: Sources of Cartesian Doubt. Aristotle's Perplexity Becomes Descartes's Doubt : Metaphysics 3, 1 and Methodical Doubt in Benito Pereira and René Descartes. [REVIEW] In Maia Neto, José Raimundo, Gianni Paganini & John Christian Laursen (eds.), Skepticism in the Modern Age: Building on the Work of Richard Popkin. Brill.
David Scott (2009). Descartes, Madness and Method. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):153-171.
Janet Broughton (2002). Descartes' Method of Doubt. Princeton University Press.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads18 ( #100,303 of 1,139,990 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #64,318 of 1,139,990 )
How can I increase my downloads?