David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 37 (02):346- (1987)
The belief in innate knowledge has a history almost as long as that of philosophy itself. In our own century it has been propounded in a linguistic context by Chomsky, who sees himself as the heir to a tradition including such philosophers as Descartes, the Cambridge Platonists and Leibniz. But the ancestor of all these is, of course, Plato's theory of recollection or anamnesis. This stands out as unique among all other innatist theses not simply because it was the first, but also because it is in some respects the strangest: Plato proposed not just a theory of innate knowledge, but of forgotten knowledge, and this, of course, goes hand in hand with his interest in the pre-existence of the soul. But my concern here is with another difference that makes Plato's theory unique, though it is not as clear as the previous one: in fact it has been for the most part over-looked by commentators and scholars. I wish to argue that while other theories of innate knowledge or ideas hold that much of what is innate in us is realized automatically and with ease, be it knowledge of moral principles, the idea of cause and effect or linguistic competence, anamnesis is concerned only with the attainment of hard philosophical knowledge, which most of us never reach
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert R. Wellman (1966). A Note on Platonic Anamnesis. Educational Theory 16 (2):169-175.
William S. Cobb (1973). Anamnesis: Platonic Doctrine or Sophistic Absurdity? Dialogue 12 (4):604-628.
Joe McCoy (2011). Re-Examining Recollection. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (4):451-466.
H. J. Easterling (1966). Anamnesis Carlo E. Huber: Anamnesis Bei Plato. (Pullacher Philosophische Forschungen, Vi.) Pp. Xxxii + 665. Munich: Max Hueber, 1964. Paper, DM. 54. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (02):166-168.
Brian Treanor (2001). God and the Other Person. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:313-324.
Christopher Gill (1989). Platonic Dialogue Charles L. Griswold (Ed.): Platonic Writings, Platonic Readings. Pp. Xi + 321. New York and London: Routledge, 1988. £25 (Paper, £11.95). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (02):252-253.
Nonna Verna Harrison (2006). Gregory Nazianzen's Festal Spirituality: Anamnesis and Mimesis. Philosophy and Theology 18 (1):27-51.
Dominic Baker-Smith (1963). John Colet and the Platonic Tradition . By Leland Miles. La Salle, Illinois, Open Court; London, George Allen and Unwin Ltd. 1961. Pp. Xix, 239. $4.50, Paper $1.75. [REVIEW] Dialogue 2 (2):235-236.
James L. Wiser (1979). Anamnesis. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 54 (2):210-211.
Charles E. M. Dunlop (1975). Anamnesis in the Phaedo. New Scholasticism 49 (1):51-61.
John E. Thomas (1977). Anamnesis in New Dress. New Scholasticism 51 (3):328-349.
S. G. Deshpande (1997). Anamnesis and Techne. Philosophical Inquiry 19 (3-4):39-53.
R. E. Allen (1959). Anamnesis in Plato's "Meno and Phaedo". Review of Metaphysics 13 (1):165 - 174.
Gerard Watson (1965). Anamnesis Bei Plato. Philosophical Studies 14:262-263.
Gregory Vlastos (1965). Anamnesis in the Meno: Part One: The Data of the Theory. Dialogue 4 (2):143-167.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads32 ( #123,523 of 1,796,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #137,591 of 1,796,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?