Pieter huiser models, theories and narratives: Conditions for the justification of religious realism. (Amsterdam: De Kok, 1998)
Religious Studies 35 (1):99-111 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesH. B. N. (1922). S. Koperberg: Polybii Historiarum Liber XXX Quoad Fieripotuit Restitutus. Dissertation. Pp. 99. Amsterdam: Campis Apud J. H. Kok, 1919. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 36 (1-2):44-.
David Degrazia (1992). Moving Forward in Bioethical Theory: Theories, Cases, and Specified Principlism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):511-539.
Michael C. Banner (1990). The Justification of Science and the Rationality of Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
R. Sansom (2003). Why Evolution is Really Indeterministic. Synthese 136 (2):263 - 279.
Michael Scott (2000). Wittgenstein and Realism. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):170-190.
Michael Philips (1986). The Justification of Punishment and the Justification of Political Authority. Law and Philosophy 5 (3):393 - 416.
Michael Scott & Andrew Moore (1997). Can Theological Realism Be Refuted? Religious Studies 33 (4):401-418.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #277,406 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
