The “concept of time” and the “being of the clock”: Bergson, Einstein, Heidegger, and the interrogation of the temporality of modernism [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 39 (2):183-213 (2006)
The topic to be addressed in this paper, that is, the distinction between the “concept” of time and the being of the clock, divides into two parts: first, in the debate between Albert Einstein and Henri Bergson, one discovers the ground for the diverging concepts of time characterized by physics in its opposing itself to philosophy. Bergson’s durée or “duration” in opposition to Einstein’s ‘physicist’s time’ as ‘public time,’ one can argue, sets the terms for Martin Heidegger’s extending, his ontological analysis of Da-sein, as human being-in-the-world. Second, in this the ‘concept of time’ gives way to the analysis of the ‘being of the clock.’ What is this being of the clock that makes evident the fundamental temporality of Da-sein? This question is rehearsed in Division Two of Being and Time. My claim is that the fundamental insight into the nature of time revealed by the encounter between Bergson and Einstein is that time extemporizes itself. Temporality “is” not a being but a process that temporalizes itself, precisely because it “is not.”
|Keywords||Philosophy Political Philosophy Philosophy of Man Phenomenology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Galison (2006). Einstein's Clocks, Poincaré's Maps: Empires of Time. Human Studies 29 (1):135-140.
Martin Heidegger & Petra Jaeger (1979). Prolegomena Zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. V. Klostermann.
Martin Heidegger (1975). Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. V. Klostermann.
Milic Capek (1971). Bergson and Modern Physics. A Reinterpretation and Re-Evaluation. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
Gavin Rae (2016). Much Ado About Nothing: The Bergsonian and Heideggerian Roots of Sartre’s Conception of Nothingness. Human Studies 39 (2):249-268.
Similar books and articles
Carlos Pedro dos Santos Gonçalves & Maria Odete Madeira, The Problem of Time in Quantum Cosmology and Non-Chronometric Temporality.
Theodore R. Schatzki (2006). The Time of Activity. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (2):155-182.
David Morris (2008). Diabetes, Chronic Illness and the Bodily Roots of Ecstatic Temporality. Human Studies 31 (4):399 - 421.
William Blattner (1999). Heidegger's Temporal Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
James Gilbert-Walsh (2010). Revisiting the Concept of Time: Archaic Perplexity in Bergson and Heidegger. [REVIEW] Human Studies 33 (2):173-190.
Frederick A. Olafson (1996). Heidegger on Presence: A Reply. Inquiry 39 (3 & 4):421 – 426.
Heath Massey (2010). On the Verge of Being and Time: Before Heidegger's Dismissal of Bergson. Philosophy Today 54 (2):138-52.
Espen Hammer (2011). Philosophy and Temporality From Kant to Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads83 ( #54,635 of 1,938,522 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #54,750 of 1,938,522 )
How can I increase my downloads?