David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):170-190 (2000)
It is clear from both his writings and lectures on religion that Wittgenstein thought that there are many differences in the standards and forms of justification informing religious and scientific discourses. However, the evidence of such differences can be used to support two quite different and conflicting lines of argument. On one apparently realist argument, the differences are taken to show that religious discourse describes different kinds of fact (or offers different kinds of description) to scientific discourse; on the other seemingly antirealist argument, the differences show that religious discourse does not have a descriptive function at all. This paper evaluates these arguments both as contributions to the debate concerning religious realism and as interpretations of Wittgenstein
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Scott (2010). Religious Language. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):505-515.
Jon Robson (2015). Religious Fictionalism and the Problem of Evil. Religious Studies 51 (3):353-360.
Similar books and articles
Clare McGraw (2007). The Realism/Anti-Realism Debate in Religion. Philosophy Compass 3 (1):254-272.
Jordan Curnutt (1998). Huang on Wittgenstein on Religious Epistemology. Religious Studies 34 (1):81-89.
Michael Kober (2006). Wittgenstein and Religion. Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):87-116.
John W. Cook (2004). The Undiscovered Wittgenstein: The Twentieth Century's Most Misunderstood Philosopher. Humanity Books.
Gabriel Citron (2012). Simple Objects of Comparison for Complex Grammars: An Alternative Strand in Wittgenstein's Later Remarks on Religion. Philosophical Investigations 35 (1):18-42.
Michael Scott (2000). Framing the Realism Question. Religious Studies 36 (4):455-471.
Peter Carruthers (1985). Ruling-Out Realism. Philosophia 15 (1-2):61-78.
Michael Resnik (1995). Scientific Vs. Mathematical Realism: The Indispensability Argument. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (2):166-174.
William Child (2007). Dreaming, Calculating, Thinking: Wittgenstein and Anti-Realism About the Past. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):252–272.
Michael Scott (2005). Do Religious Beliefs Aim at the Truth? Religious Studies 41 (2):217-224.
Philip R. Shields (1993). Logic and Sin in the Writings of Ludwig Wittgenstein. University of Chicago Press.
Bob Plant (2004). The Wretchedness of Belief: Wittgenstein on Guilt, Religion, and Recompense. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (3):449 - 476.
Michael R. Slater (2008). Pragmatism, Realism, and Religion. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):653-681.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads11 ( #250,455 of 1,778,270 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,352 of 1,778,270 )
How can I increase my downloads?