William of Ockham: Dialogus: Part 2; Part 3, Tract 1
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP/British Academy (2011)
William of Ockham was a medieval English philosopher and theologian (he was born about 1285, perhaps as late as 1288, and died in 1347 or 1348). In 1328 Ockham turned away from 'pure' philosophy and theology to polemic. From that year until the end of his life he worked to overthrow what he saw as the tyranny of Pope John XXII (1316-1334) and of his successors Popes Benedict XII (1334-1342) and Clement VI (1342-1352). This campaign led him into questions of ecclesiology (the study of the nature and structure of the Christian Church, e.g. of the functions and powers of the pope) and political philosophy. The Dialogus purports to be a transcript made by a mature student of lengthy discussions between himself and a university master about the various opinions of the learned on the matters disputed between John XXII and the dissident Franciscans. The student is usually the initiator; he chooses the topics, asks most of the questions and decides when he has heard enough. The master is, so to speak, an expert witness whom the student examines. This volume publishes an edition of two elements of the Dialogus. Part 2 of the Dialogus is not in dialogue form and may not to be the work of Ockham himself. Part 3 is divided into two tracts. Tract 1, which is reproduced in this volume, is on the power of the Pope and clergy. Liberal thinking in modern times builds on certain earlier ancient and medieval political ideas, which Ockham reasserted, defended and helped to perpetuate. Thus there are elements in his ecclesiology and political philosophy that anticipate the views of Locke, Mill, and other modern liberals.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Virpi Mäkinen (2012). William of Ockham, Dialogus, Part 2, Part 3, Tract 1 (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (4):615-616.
Arthur Stephen McGrade (1974). The Political Thought of William of Ockham. New York]Cambridge University Press.
Jeffrey E. Brower (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Ockham (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (4):588-589.
Lukáš Lička (2012). Supozice mentálního termínu podle Viléma Ockhama. Studia Neoaristotelica 9 (3):20-62.
Susan Brower-Toland (2011). Lectura super sententias: Liber I, distinctiones 1–2, 3–7, 8–17 (review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):120-121.
William Ockham (1983). Predestination, Foreknowledge, and Future Contingents. Indianapolis: Hackett.
William J. Courtenay (2008). Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of His Thought. Brill.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2007). Theory of Supposition Vs. Theory of Fallacies in Ockham. Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):343-359.
Roberto Lambertini (2006). Francis of Marchia and William of Ockham: Fragments From a Dialogue. Vivarium 44 (1):184-204.
Stephen Chak Tornay (1938). Ockham: Studies and Selections. La Salle, Ill.,The Open Court Publishing Company.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?