David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 87 (04):477-495 (2012)
In post-war France we have witnessed an upsurge in philosophical and quasi-philosophical literature, much of it nonsense and all of it radically politicised. What is the explanation of this? I advance the thesis that the post-1968 literary scene expresses a bid for a new kind of social membership, and that it is the hunger for membership that explains not only the intellectual structure of this literature but also its worldwide influence. I also suggest that there survives in this literature both an intellectual agenda and a historical memory, in which the war-time experience of France is allimportant. In the course of my argument I try to explain the radical difference between analytical philosophy, which permits its practitioners to have unorthodox (i.e. non-left-wing) political views, and a particular post-war French intellectual tradition, which has until recently allowed no such deviation from its tacit norms
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gilles Deleuze & Felix Guattari (1991). What is Philosophy? Columbia University Press.
Dan Sperber (1996). Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
G. Deleuze & F. Guattari (1999). What is Philosophy?(Slovak Translation of an Essay by Deleuze and Guattari). Filozofia 54 (1):41-47.
Alan D. Sokal & J. Bricmont (1999). Impostures Intellectuelles. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chris Tucker (2014). Why Sceptical Theism Isn’T Sceptical Enough. In Trent Doughtery & Justin McBrayer (eds.), Skeptical Theism: New Essays. Oxford University Press 45-62.
Stephen Hetherington (2009). Sceptical Possibilities? No Worries. Synthese 168 (1):97 - 118.
Erik J. Wielenberg (2010). Sceptical Theism and Divine Lies. Religious Studies 46 (4):509-523.
By Duncan Pritchard (2005). The Structure of Sceptical Arguments. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):37–52.
Duncan Pritchard (2005). The Structure of Sceptical Arguments. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):37 - 52.
Gene Fendt (1995). Confessions'bliss: Postmodern Criticism as a Palimpsest of Augustine's Confessions. Heythrop Journal 36 (1):30–45.
James Beebe (2010). Constraints on Sceptical Hypotheses. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):449-470.
Steven L. Reynolds (2013). Effective Sceptical Hypotheses. Theoria 79 (3):262-278.
Duncan Pritchard (2016). Contents. In Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Princeton University Press
Stephen Cade Hetherington (1994). Sceptical Insulation and Sceptical Objectivity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (4):411 – 425.
Aaron Segal (2011). Sceptical Theism and Divine Truths. Religious Studies 47 (1):85-95.
Duncan Pritchard (2005). Neo-Mooreanism, Contextualism, and the Evidential Basis of Scepticism. Acta Analytica 20 (2):3-25.
Michael D. Reeve (2004). The text of Augustine's confessions B. alexanderson: Le texte Des confessions de saint Augustin. Manuscrits et stemma . (Acta regiae societatis scientiarum et litterarum gothoburgensis, humaniora, 42.) pp. 105. Göteborg: Kungl. Vetenskaps- och vitterhets-samhället, 2003. Paper. Isbn:91-85252-63-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (02):414-.
Chris Lindsay (2005). Reid on Scepticism About Agency and the Self. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (1):19-33.
Added to index2012-10-05
Total downloads20 ( #231,991 of 1,932,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #333,140 of 1,932,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?