David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):151-160 (2002)
In his Ethics, Spinoza maintains that God’s essence is expressed as both thought and extension. Despite this claim, however, Spinoza’s very definition of truth, understood as adequation, would seem to reduce the aspect of extension to an exclusively intellectual paradigm. I question the extent to which a body remains a body throughout the Ethics in the transition from the first knowledge of the imagination to the highest know ledge of adequate ideas. As a way to think beyond the totality of adequation, I tum to Emmanuel Levinas’s distinction between totality and infinity. I reference Levinas in order to highlight certain impasses within Spinoza’s system and to serve as a possible alternative articulation of an extensional love of God
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Juffé (2007). Levinas as (Mis)Reader of Spinoza. Levinas Studies 2:153-173.
Nicholas Okrent (1998). Spinoza on the Essence, Mutability and Power of God. Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):71-84.
Charles Huenemann (2004). Spinoza and Prime Matter. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (1):21-32.
Tammy Nyden (1998). Salvation in a Naturalized World: The Role of the Will and Intellect in the Philosophies of Nietzsche and Spinoza. NASS (North American Spinoza Society) Monograph 7:17-31.
Frank Lucash (2006). What is the Relationship Between Ideas in the Human Mind and Ideas in the Mind of God for Spinoza? Sophia 45 (1):25-41.
Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2011). Why Spinoza is Not an Eleatic Monist (Or Why Diversity Exists). In Philip Goff (ed.), Spinoza on Monism. Palgrave
Carlos Fraenkel (2006). Maimonides' God and Spinoza's. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2).
Sherry Deveaux (2003). The Divine Essence and the Conception of God in Spinoza. Synthese 135 (3):329 - 338.
John F. X. Knasas (2002). Contra Spinoza. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):417-429.
Nancy Levene (2004). Spinoza's Revelation: Religion, Democracy, and Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Brandon C. Look (forthcoming). Existence, Essence, Et Expression: Leibniz Sur 'Toutes les Absurdités du Dieu de Spinoza'. In Pierre-Francois Moreau & Mogens Laerke (eds.), Spinoza et Leibniz.
Richard Cohen (1998). To Love God for Nothing: Levinas and Spinoza. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 20 (2/1):339-352.
Arne Naess (1980). Environmental Ethics and Spinoza's Ethics. Comments on Genevieve Lloyd's Article. Inquiry 23 (3):313 – 325.
Mogens Laerke (2011). Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God. Archiv Fuer Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58 - 84.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads11 ( #326,694 of 1,934,734 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,687 of 1,934,734 )
How can I increase my downloads?