|Abstract||Throughout the history of the study of man there has been a fundamental opposition between those who believe that progress is to be made by a rigorous observation of man's actual behavior and those who believe that such observations are interesting only in so far as they reveal to us hidden and possibly fairly mysterious underlying laws that only partially and in distorted form reveal themselves to us in behavior. Freud, for example, is in the latter class, most of American social science in the former.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Morton E. Winston (1976). Did a (Kuhnian) Scientific Revolution Occur in Linguistics? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:25 - 33.
Guy Longworth (2009). Ignorance of Linguistics: A Note on Devitt's Ignorance of Language. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):21-34.
Barry C. Smith (2006). Why We Still Need Knowledge of Language. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (18):431-457.
André Joly (1985). Cartesian or Condillacian Linguistics? Topoi 4 (2):145-149.
Guy Longworth (2009). Ignorance of Linguistics. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):21-34.
Noam Chomsky (2008). The Essential Chomsky. New Press.
Mahesh Ananth (2010). The Scientific Study of Consciousness: Searle’s Radical Request. Psyche 16 (2):59-89.
Robert N. Mccauley (1986). Problem Solving in Science and the Competence Approach to Theorizing in Linguistics. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 16 (3):299–312.
Peter Slezak (2009). Linguistic Explanation and ‘Psychological Reality’. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):3-20.
Jonathan Knowles (2000). Knowledge of Grammar as a Propositional Attitude. Philosophical Psychology 13 (3):325 – 353.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads99 ( #8,013 of 722,934 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,866 of 722,934 )
How can I increase my downloads?